a) There is no symmetric nash equilibrium in this case. A symmetric nash equilibrium is the one in which each player chooses the same strategy. If no one calls then each would get a better payoff by calling i.e. from 0 to 2/3 and if everyone calls each would get a better pay off by choosing not to call i.e. from 2/3 to 1. Hence each player has a tendency to deviate provided other players dont change their strategies.
b) Again the argument for the non existence of symmetric nash equilibrium is same as part a).
The probability that no one calls is 1/2^N because out of the total of 2^N case of startegies (each of the N player has 2 strategies) there is only case where no one calls.
As N increases the denominator increases and hence the probability that no one calls also decreases
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.