2) For two agents, a and b, with the following utility functions over goods x and y (6)
ua=ua(xa,ya)=xaya
ub=ub(xb,yb)=xbyb
a) Determine the slope of the contract curve in the interior of an Edgeworth box that would show this two-person two-goods situation.
b) For initial endowments ωa=(12,7) and ωb=(9,10), what is the Walras allocation between the two agents a and b? (Remember that it is the relative price of the goods that matters in this consideration. Also remember that all the units of goods that exist here are will end up with one or the other agent; so, the overall 21 units of x and the 17 units of y will be fully allocated between the two. )
c) Calculate the utility level before and after trading.
3) For two agents, a and b, with the following utility functions over goods x and y (6)
ua=ua(xa,ya)=xa13ya23
ub=ub(xb,yb)=xb12yb12
a) Determine the slope of the contract curve in the interior of an Edgeworth box that would show this two-person two-goods situation.
b) For initial endowments ωa=(9,8) and ωb=(6,7), what is the Walras allocation between the two agents a and b?
c) Calculate the utility level before and after trading.
I have done question 2 for you. I hope it helps.
(a) The condition for the contract curve:
MRSa = MRSb = Px/Py
=> (Del ua/Del xa) / (Del ua/Del ya) = (Del ub/Del xb) / (Del ub/Del yb)
=> ya/xa = yb/xb = Px/Py ........(1)
=> ya xb = xa yb ..............(2)
Also, we know that the sum of the values of x and y consumed by both a and b will be equal to the supply of x and y respectively, i.e.
xa + xb = x .........(3)
ya + yb = y ..........(4)
Now, from (2),(3) and (4) :-
ya (x-xa) = xa (y-ya)
=> x ya - ya xa = y xa - ya xa
=> x ya = y xa
The above equation gives the Contract curve. Its slope is
ya/xa = y/x
From (1), this value is equal to Px/Py.
(b) ua = xa ya ub = xb yb
wa = (12,7) wb = (9,10)
ma = 12Px + 7Py mb = 9Px + 10Py
Now, suppose Px = 1. According to Walras law, if x market is in equilibrium then y market will be in equilibrium as well.
Demand for x by a + Demand for x by b = Supply for x {You can do this with market for y as well}
=> ma/2Px + mb/2Px = 12+9
=> (12Px + 7Py) /2Px + (9Px + 10Py) /2Px = 21
=> 6 + 7Py/2 + 9/2 + 5Py = 21 {Since Px =1}
=> 17Py/2 = 21/2
=> Py = 21/17
Therefore, walrasian relative equilibrium price is: Px/Py= 17/21
Now, the walrasian allocation is:
(xa,ya) = (ma/2Px , ma/2Py) = ( (12Px + 7Py) /2Px , (12Px + 7Py) /2Py ) = (351/34 , 351/42) = (10.32 , 8.36)
(xb,yb) = (mb/2Px , mb/2Py) = ( (9Px + 10Py) /2Px , (9Px + 10Py) /2Py ) = (363/34 , 363/42) = (10.68 , 8.64)
(c) Utility before trading, ua(xa=12 , ya=7) = 12*7 = 84
and ub(xb=9 , yb=10) = 9*10 = 90
Utility after trading, ua(xa=351/34 , ya=351/42) = (351/34)*(351/42) = 86.28
and ub(xb=363/34 , yb=363/42) = (363/34)*(363/42) = 92.28
Therefore, trading has increased the utility for both a and b, thus the earlier endowment was an inefficient allocation.
NOTE: The demand for x in part (b) is calculated using lagrangean method as follows:
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.