Question

. Do you agree that attendance at sporting events is explained by the uncertainty-of-outcome hypothesis (UOH)?

. Do you agree that attendance at sporting events is explained by the uncertainty-of-outcome hypothesis (UOH)?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

ANSWER

AGREE

The classical Uncertainty of Outcome Hypothesis (UOH) informs economists’ understanding consumer decisions to attend sporting events and models of team revenue generation. Coates, Humphreys and Zhou (2014) developed a reference dependent preference based consumer choice model under uncertainty to motivate the UOH in which loss-averse consumers prefer games with certain outcomes. We develop an alternative model based on a standard expected utility model of fan behavior which incorporates fans’ decisions to travel to away games and aggregates decisions across local and visiting fans. This model generates predictions consistent with the classical UOH and concave team and league-wide total revenue functions.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
‘The rate of return is the most important outcome for an investment(portfolio).’ Do you agree with...
‘The rate of return is the most important outcome for an investment(portfolio).’ Do you agree with this statement? Explain.(no less than 150 words)
YB Sporting prints up novelty T-shirt commemorating major sport events. The T-shirt cost $5 to make...
YB Sporting prints up novelty T-shirt commemorating major sport events. The T-shirt cost $5 to make and distribute and sell for $20. Company policy is to dispose of any excess inventory after the event by discounting the T-shirts by 80 percent, that is, sell for $4. For an upcoming event, the demand is estimated to be 12,000 shirts, with a significant amount of uncertainty. Due to this uncertainty, YB printed only 10,000 shirts. What do you think of this decision?...
Taxes on income do not necessarily result in the same labor supply outcome for every worker....
Taxes on income do not necessarily result in the same labor supply outcome for every worker. Do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer using graphs showing the income and substitution effects.
Are Corporations people? do you agree with this analysis and why?
Are Corporations people? do you agree with this analysis and why?
Do you agree with the policy maker’s cost-containment strategies. Describe why you agree or disagree and...
Do you agree with the policy maker’s cost-containment strategies. Describe why you agree or disagree and include one or more insights from your readings that relate to the the question of how information technology could, or could not, help contain costs while supporting health care reform initiatives.
Review the sample solution to the Laura Nash method. Do you agree with that analysis? If...
Review the sample solution to the Laura Nash method. Do you agree with that analysis? If so, what parts do you think really helped you work through the dilemma? If not, which parts do you not agree with?
Do you agree with the "America First" policy or do you believe that the United States...
Do you agree with the "America First" policy or do you believe that the United States should pursue a moral imperative to stand up for the rights of others who are not yet free?
What do you think about "conspicuous consumption"? Do you agree or disagree with the notion? Why?
What do you think about "conspicuous consumption"? Do you agree or disagree with the notion? Why?
The Beatles said, “all you need is love.” Do you agree? Why? What else do you...
The Beatles said, “all you need is love.” Do you agree? Why? What else do you need,and what?
Do you agree with the Fed loaning money to financial institutions that are solvent, but illiquid?...
Do you agree with the Fed loaning money to financial institutions that are solvent, but illiquid? Do you agree with the Fed loaning money to financial institutions who are insolvent? Why or why not?