Please answer below two question in your own words and
in brief
The following passage summarizes some of the central points in
the debate as to the value of corporations to devote significant
resources to corporate social responsibility:
Stakeholders Versus Shareholders
Although corporate social responsibility may appear to be an
“apple-pie virtue,” it is quite controversial. Below are some of
the chief arguments for and against it:
Proponents will claim that it…
- BURNISHES A COMPANY’S REPUTATION. In the wake of corporate
scandals, corporate social responsibility builds goodwill—and can
pay off when scandals or regulatory scrutiny inevitably arise.
- ATTRACTS TALENT. Many young professionals expect their
employers to be active in social issues. Membership in
Netimpact.org, a network of socially-conscious MBA graduates,
jumped from 4,000 in 2002 to 10,000 in 2004.
On the other hand, Detractors will argue that
it…
- COSTS TOO MUCH. Giving by corporate
foundations reached an all-time high of $3.6 billion last year.
However, it can come at the expense of other priorities, such as
research and development, and is rarely valued by Wall Street.
- IS MISGUIDED. Many corporate executives
believe, as economist Milton Friedman does, that the role of
business is to generate profits for shareholders—not to spend
others’ money for some perceived social benefit.
- What is your view on this issue? Would that view be different
if you were a stockholder of a firm?
- Do you know of any companies that have engaged in Socially
Responsible behavior? Please explain, Please use an example
that is not used in the textbook.)