'In the long run, a profit-maximizing firm would never knowingly market unsafe products. However, in the short run, unsafe products can do a lot of damage.' Discuss this statement ; use example from Palestinian Business environment .
Answer:
The marketing of unsafe items is clearly conflicting with long-run
benefit maximization. For illustration, no pharmaceutical producer
would intentionally advertise drugs with negative side-effects much
more prominent than expecting benefits. Shockingly,
undercapitalized or "hit and run" producers can dispense a parcel
of harm within the brief run some time recently the negative
side-effects of drugs and other items are completely realized. When
the amount and quality of shopper data is restricted, botches can
and do happen. From this viewpoint, government or industry control
of item security has the potential to diminish the social costs
that result from unsafe items.
(plz give me a thums up...if my answer helped you and if any suggestion plz comment, Yr thums up boost me)
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.