Q23:
In 2009, in response to the global financial crisis, the Labor Government handed out $900 cheques to almost all Australian tax-payers. This was an example of
Keynesian policy in action, aimed at speeding recovery through boosting demand. |
||
Keynesian policy in action, aimed at speeding recovery through boosting supply. |
||
Hayekian policy in action, aimed at speeding recovery through boosting demand. |
||
Hayekian policy in action, aimed at speeding recovery through boosting supply |
Q24:
Which of the following displays these two characteristics: non-rivalry and non-excludability in consumption?
Air |
||
Fuel |
||
Clothes |
||
Netflix |
Q23. DUE TO GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS IN 2009 $900 CHEQUES WERE
HANDED TO ALMOST ALL AUSTRELIAN TAX PAYERS BY LABOURGOVERMENT.
SINCE THE PERIOD WAS OF FINANCIAL CRISIS , THUS MONEY SUPPLY WAS
LOW DURING THAT TIME. THIS PARTICULAR ACT FOLLOWS KEYNESIAN POLICY
AIMING AT BOOSTING AT SUPPLY OG MONEY DURING FINANCIAL
CRISIS.
ANSWER: OPTION 2
SINCE HAYEKIAN WAS A CRITIC TO KEYNESIAN POLICY AND BELIVED IN FREE MARKET CAPITALISM.THUS OPTION 3 & 4 ARE INCORRECT.
Q24. NO RIVAL ARE THOSE WHICH OF ONE CUSTOME BUYS OTHER ALSO GET
EQUAL CHANCE OF BUYING.
NON- EXCLUDABLE ARE THOSE WHICH CAN BE ACCESSED WITHOUT PAYING
ANYTHING.
HERE AIR IS AVAILABLE FOR ALL AND ITS FREE FOR ALL.
ANSWER: AIR
HOWEVER WE PAY PRICES FOR FUEL,CLOTH AND NETFLIX. SO ALL THESE ARE
EXCLUDABLE.
HOWEVER NETFLIX IS NON RIVALRY BUT OTHER TWO ARE RIVALRY. THUS
APART FROM AIR, NONE THE OPTIONS HAVE BOTH CHARECTERS
SIMULTANEOUSLY.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.