Question

)Suppose that Wakanda is concerned about eciently allocating its limited supply of Vibranium, a nonrenewable natural...

)Suppose that Wakanda is concerned about eciently allocating its limited
supply of Vibranium, a nonrenewable natural resource, over two time periods.
Assume that the inverse demand for Vibranium in the two periods is given
by:
MB = 350 − 2q
where q denotes the amount of Vibranium consumed. The marginal cost of
extracting Vibranium is denoted by:
MC = 50 + q
a.How much Vibranium would Wakandans wish to have in each time period,
ignoring the other time period? That is, what is the static ecient amount of
Vibranium to be consumed in each period? (4 pts)
Now, suppose that there are a total of 100 units of Vibranium available for
the two periods. Let the discount rate be r = 5%.
b.What is the magnitude of scarcity of Vibranium (in units) over the two
time periods, using the static allocations? (3 pts)
c.Now, solve for the dynamically ecient allocation of Vibranium. (4 pts)
d.Show the dynamically ecient allocation graphically. (4 pts)
e.What would be the marginal user cost ineach period? No need to
discount the second period MUC. (4 pts
I need help with a b c d e

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Consider a nonrenewable resource that can be consumed either today (period 1) or tomorrow (period 2)...
Consider a nonrenewable resource that can be consumed either today (period 1) or tomorrow (period 2) and has a finite supply of 12 units. Assume the inverse demand for the resource in both periods is: P_1 = 90 - 5Q_1 P_2 = 90 - 5Q_2 Assume the marginal cost of extracting the resource is constant at $15 and the social discount rate is 10 percent (r = .10). If the social discount rate is decreased to 5% (r = .05),...
In this problem you will compute the dynamically efficient allocation of a depletable, non-recyclable resource. To...
In this problem you will compute the dynamically efficient allocation of a depletable, non-recyclable resource. To answer the questions below, assume the following: Allocate resource between two time periods t=1,2 The fixed supply of the resource is 10 barrels Demand is same in both periods and given by Pt = 15 – qt Marginal cost of extracting the resource is the same in both periods and is given by MCt=$5 The discount rate is 7% 1. What is the equation...
) In class, we developed a simple two-period model of dynamically efficient etraction of a nonrenewable...
) In class, we developed a simple two-period model of dynamically efficient etraction of a nonrenewable resource with a finite stock of 20 units, constant marginal extraction costs of 2.0, and constant demand given by the inverse demand function: p = 8 - 0.4 q Everything remains as before (including the 10% interest rate), except for the demand for the resource. We now change the situation in the following manner: we know in period 1 that due to technological change,...
Efficient Allocations for Depletable Resources n = 2 time periods. Inverse Demand Curves: P1 = 10...
Efficient Allocations for Depletable Resources n = 2 time periods. Inverse Demand Curves: P1 = 10 - 0.4q1 for period 1 and P2 = 10 - 0.4q2 for period 2. Marginal Costs for the two periods:   MC1 = $3.00   MC2 = $3.00 Discount rate = 15% Resource Availability Constraint:   Q = q1 + q2 = 25 billion units. Calculate the dynamically efficient allocations q1* and q2* for periods 1 and 2. Dynamic efficiency condition MNB1 = λ = PV MNB2...
step by step solution for the below question please Flag this Question Question 11 pts What...
step by step solution for the below question please Flag this Question Question 11 pts What is the difference between positive economics and normative economics? Group of answer choices Positive economics deals with dynamic systems, while normative economics focuses on static systems. Normative economics deals with how the world actually works, whereas positive economics focuses on what people ought to do. Positive economics requires making value judgments, while normative economics relies solely on factual statements. Normative economics applies in cases...