Question

Minnesota has two oil refineries that emit methane gas. The Bend refinery emits 300 units of...

Minnesota has two oil refineries that emit methane gas. The Bend refinery emits 300 units of methane and the Park refinery emits 900 units of methane. Government regulators would like to reduce total methane emissions from 1,200 to 900 units. Bend’s total abatement cost is TCB = 400QB + 4QB 2 where Q is units of methane. Park’s total abatement cost is TCP = 40QP + 2QP 2.

a. Suppose that government regulators require each refinery to remove 150 units of methane. What is the total cost of removing these 300 units (TCB + TCP)?

b. Now suppose that the government regulators evenly split 900 methane pollution permits between the two refineries. What is the total cost of removing 300 units of methane, using a tradable permit system?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Solution

answered by: anonymous
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Two firms, Washburn (W) and Pillsbury (P), emit effluent into the Mississippi River as part of...
Two firms, Washburn (W) and Pillsbury (P), emit effluent into the Mississippi River as part of their flour-making operations. This effluent causes problems with the biochemical balance in the river and so the government wants to cut the amount of emissions by 10,000 gallons per day. W has an older factory and so has a higher cost of reducing its effluent emissions.The two total abatement cost functions (with abatement measured in thousands of gallons per day) are: TCw = 6...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total...
Suppose there are only two sources of SO2 emissions in Ohio. Source 1 is a coal...
Suppose there are only two sources of SO2 emissions in Ohio. Source 1 is a coal fired power plant and Source 2 is an oil refinery. Marginal control costs for the two firms are given by MCC1=100*q1 and MCC2=300*q2, where q1 and q2 represent the tons of pollution that each respective firm controls. Each of these two sources both currently emits 20 tons of sulfur dioxide. Ohio's government decides that it wants to reduce SO2 pollution by 20 tons total....
There are two polluters in a specific region, each of whom is currently emitting 100 units...
There are two polluters in a specific region, each of whom is currently emitting 100 units of pollution for a total of 200 units of pollution in the region. The government wants to reduce total pollution by 60 units (i.e., A_ST = 60 ). For simplicity, ignore enforcement costs. The total and marginal abatement costs of each polluter are as follows:                                             TAC_1 = 0.2A_1^2 → MAC_1 = 0.4A_1 TAC_2 = 0.3A_2^2 → MAC_2 = 0.6A_2 Market Approach: Tradable Pollution Permits...
1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region, each of which generated 10...
1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region, each of which generated 10 units of pollution for a total of 20 units released into the environment. The government determined that emissions must be reduced by 12 units across the region to achieve the ”socially desirable level of pollu- tion”. Each firm faces different abatement cost conditions modelled as follows: for Polluter 1, marginal abatement cost is MAC1 = 26- 2.6E1. For Polluter 2, marginal abatement cost is...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB = 35 − 0.5Q What is the efficient level of abatement? (d) What is the relationship between cost-effectiveness and efficiency? (e) What pollution tax would yield the efficient level of abatement you found in part (c)? If the pollution charge is levied on all units of emissions, how much revenue would the government receive? (f)...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The...