Question

Explain the concept of optimal pollution. Why might an ardent environmentalist and an economist have different...

Explain the concept of optimal pollution. Why might an ardent environmentalist and an economist have different views as to where "optimal" was?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer)

The optimum level of pollution refers to the point where marginal social costs equal marginal social benefits. Firms pollute and pay tax as long as that costs less than abating. They want to reduce their pollution if they cost of abating one more unit is less than cost of paying tax on one more unit. When firms have different marginal abatement cost at a given standard limit of pollution, it is in high-cost firm’s interest to offer to buy permits from low cost firms. The low cost firm would demand a price no less than their own marginal abatement cost and the high cost firm will not agree to pay higher price than their own marginal benefit.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
What is meant by "optimal" pollution? Explain why there might be different estimates of marginal external...
What is meant by "optimal" pollution? Explain why there might be different estimates of marginal external benefits and costs
Explain the costs and benefits that may influence the optimal flock size in birds? Why might...
Explain the costs and benefits that may influence the optimal flock size in birds? Why might random patterns of species dispersal be the rarest patterns in nature
What factors might explain why these two companies, which operate in similar markets, have different accounts...
What factors might explain why these two companies, which operate in similar markets, have different accounts receivable turnover ratios?
Suppose that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution. Assume that the optimal...
Suppose that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution. Assume that the optimal tax would be $1,500, but government officials have set the tax at $500. At the equilibrium with the $500 tax: a. there will be too much pollution. b. the marginal social cost of pollution will be less than $500. c. the marginal social benefit of pollution will be less than $500. d. the marginal social benefit of pollution will be more than $500.
Suppose you are charged with determining the optimal amount of pollution for a community. You are...
Suppose you are charged with determining the optimal amount of pollution for a community. You are told that the marginal social cost (MSC) of pollution for the community can be expressed as a linear relationship over the relevant quantities of pollution. You are also told that the marginal social benefit (MSB) of pollution for the community can be expressed as a linear relationship over the relevant quantities of pollution. data available: - When there are 10 tons of pollution per...
Describe three different uses of GDP, or give three different reasons to explain why it might...
Describe three different uses of GDP, or give three different reasons to explain why it might be useful to calculate GDP.
Explain why the optimal point of production is where MR = MC
Explain why the optimal point of production is where MR = MC
a. Explain in writing and with a graph how markets where production generates pollution will fail...
a. Explain in writing and with a graph how markets where production generates pollution will fail to produce the efficient amount of the good that causes pollution. b. How might government intervene to improve on this outcome? Explain.
Externalities, such as pollution, cause market failure. Explain what is meant by market failure. What are...
Externalities, such as pollution, cause market failure. Explain what is meant by market failure. What are some of the costs of controlling pollution. Is a perfectly clean environment economically desirable? Given all we know about the hazards of pollution, what should we do to get rid of pollution? What are the Conservative, Liberal and radical views of what should be done? With which do you agree and why?
Explain why companies that choose low-pollution technologies will find it hard to survive in a competitive...
Explain why companies that choose low-pollution technologies will find it hard to survive in a competitive industry. Find an example in the newspaper or in a magazine where a company implemented low pollution technology? What was the result of their implementation? Were they able to stay competitive. (Be sure to reference your article.)