A firm must decide which one of the three alternatives below it should select to expand its capacity. The firm wishes a minimum annual profit of 20% of the initial cost of each separable increment of investment. Any money not invested in capacity expansion can be invested (forever) elsewhere for an annual yield of 20% of initial cost. Your reasoning must include the ∆IRR for each Challenger-Defender comparison.
Alternative |
Initial Cost |
Annual Profit |
Profit Rate |
A |
$100,000 |
$30,000 |
30% |
B |
$280,000 |
$82,000 |
29.29% |
C |
$410,000 |
$110,000 |
26.83% |
In the table below, list the challengers and defenders and the ∆IRR between them and which one is the winner. I have given the first Challenger and Defender (A –“Do Nothing”).
Challenger |
Defender |
∆IRR |
Winner |
A |
“Do Nothing” |
||
This cell indicates alternative selected
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.