Question

A thief and a security guard are playing a simultaneous game. The thief will choose whether...

A thief and a security guard are playing a simultaneous game. The thief will choose whether or not to steal, while the guard will choose whether or not to be vigilant. If the thief steals and the security guard is vigilant, the thief gets caught and suffers a loss of 20, while the security guard gets a bonus worth 15. However, if the thief steals and the security guard is not vigilant, the thief does not get caught and gains 15, while the guard loses 5. On the other hand, if the thief does not steal and the guard is vigilant, the guard loses 3 for the effort, while the thief gains nothing. Finally, if the thief does not steal and the guard is not vigilant, neither one of them gain anything. ​What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous game? ​Steal, Vigilant ​Steal, Not vigilant ​Not steal, Vigilant ​The game has no Nash equilibrium

Homework Answers

Answer #1
guard/thief Steal Not Steal
Vigilant 15,-20 -3,0
not vigilant and not caught the thief -5,15 0,0

given above is the matrix form of the given game . Here if the guard is vigilant is given ,. it is best for the thief to not steal . Similarly, if the guard ois not vigilant , it is best for the thief to steal because he would not get caught and hence has a higher payoff there.

On the other hand if the thief decides to steal the best strategy for guard is to be vigilant and if he decides to not steal, the guard decides to ne not vigilant since in that case he gets a higher payoff and does not lose his effort.

so there is no nash equilibrium in this case.

Answer is option D)No nash equilibrium

(You can comment for doubts )

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A shoplifter and a security guard are playing a simultaneous game. If the shoplifter steals and...
A shoplifter and a security guard are playing a simultaneous game. If the shoplifter steals and the security guard is vigilant, the shoplifter gets caught she suffers a loss of 20, and the security guard gets a bonus worth 15. If the shoplifter steals and the security guard is not vigilant, she does not get caught and gains 15 and the guard loses 5. If the shoplifter does not steal and the guard is vigilant, the guard loses 3 for...
Suppose Agnieszka and Stephanie are playing rock, paper, scissors game. They choose their actions simultaneously. The...
Suppose Agnieszka and Stephanie are playing rock, paper, scissors game. They choose their actions simultaneously. The consequences are as follows: the one who loses has to grade all BUS1040 essays, the one who wins does not have to grade any exams. In case of a tie, they split the pile of BUS1040 essays equally for grading. Assuming that Agnieszka and Stephanie do not like grading exams, which answer is correct? a. There is no Nash Equilibrium in this game. b....
Two street races are playing a simultaneous game of chicken. They have to race towards each...
Two street races are playing a simultaneous game of chicken. They have to race towards each other and whoever swerves first is chicken and faces shame, a loss of 8, while the winner enjoys a gain of 3. If neither stop, they would crash into each other, a loss of 10. If both of them swerve at the same time, they are both chicken and face a loss of 5 each. What would the Nash equilibrium be in this game?...
Answer the following questions about oligopolistic markets for a simultaneous game in which Microsoft and Apple...
Answer the following questions about oligopolistic markets for a simultaneous game in which Microsoft and Apple decide whether to advertise or not. Players: Apple and Microsoft (MS) Strategies: Advertise (A) or No-Ads (NA) Payoffs: If both choose to A, Apple gets $8 billion revenue and MS gets $16 billion revenue; If Apple choose A and MS choose NA, Apple gets $15 billion and MS gets $12 billion; If Apple choose NA and MS choose A, Apple gets $10 billion and...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From the April 2004 Issue Save Share 8.95 In 1991, Progressive Insurance, an automobile insurer based in Mayfield Village, Ohio, had approximately $1.3 billion in sales. By 2002, that figure had grown to $9.5 billion. What fashionable strategies did Progressive employ to achieve sevenfold growth in just over a decade? Was it positioned in a high-growth industry? Hardly. Auto insurance is a mature, 100-year-old industry...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich,...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich, O. C. Ferrell, and Jennifer Jackson, with the editorial assistance of Jennifer Sawayda. This case was developed for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative, ethical, or legal discussion by management. All sources used for this case were obtained through publicly available material. Mattel, Inc. is a world leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of family...
QUESTION 1 ? What is the relationship between family dysfunction and schizophrenia? a. ?Research has substantiated...
QUESTION 1 ? What is the relationship between family dysfunction and schizophrenia? a. ?Research has substantiated a link between family dysfunction and schizophrenia but can't say which causes the other. b. ?Family dysfunction is a major causative factor for schizophrenia. c. ?Research has failed to substantiate a direct causal link between family dysfunction and schizophrenia. d. ?Family dysfunction plays a minor role in developing schizophrenia. 1.00000 points    QUESTION 2 ? Chuck has no life plan; he simply lives from...
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation....
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation. case:    W17400 APIGEE: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE CHALLENGE OF GROWTH Ranjeet Nambudiri, S. Ramnarayan, and Catherine Xavier wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...