Question

Suppose you were asked to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of a proposed regulation that would reduce...

Suppose you were asked to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of a proposed regulation

that would reduce air pollution in an urban area by a certain amount. What method(s)

would you use to do so? What are some measures you could take to make sure that

your recommendation was both economically efficient and just? Justify your answer.

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Suppose you were asked to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of a proposed regulation that would reduce...
Suppose you were asked to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of a proposed regulation that would reduce air pollution in an urban area by a certain amount. What method(s) would you use to do so? (ex: What are some measures you could take to make sure that your recommendation was both economically efficient and just? Justify your answer.
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose the government wants to reduce the...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce...
5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The...
Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total...
Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates...
Suppose you are using cost-benefit analysis to evaluate a policy aimed at limiting the use of...
Suppose you are using cost-benefit analysis to evaluate a policy aimed at limiting the use of a pesticide applied to grain crops. Give examples of the following that would have to be estimated to conduct this analysis properly.  You do not have to estimate any dollar values, just description: What are the risks? What are the associated costs? What are the associated benefits?
In 1992, the Bush administration wanted to change the way benefit/cost analysis of regulations are performed....
In 1992, the Bush administration wanted to change the way benefit/cost analysis of regulations are performed. Specifically, when computing the cost of a regulation, the administration wanted agencies to take into account the reduction in income that the regulation brings about. The theory behind this suggested change was that regulations cost people money, and the poorer people become, the more likely they are to get ill or die early. One study cited by the Labor Department estimated that each $7.5...
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each...
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs,...
Should decisions about natural resource policy be made based on cost benefit analysis? b.The Department of...
Should decisions about natural resource policy be made based on cost benefit analysis? b.The Department of Natural Resources is planning a program for protecting a wilderness area and has evaluated three options (labelled A, B, and C below) using cost-benefit analysis techniques. Some of the results are presented in the following table. Option A B C Total benefits $68 957 $63 757 $24 325 Total costs $6 272 $4 156 $3 655 Benefit to cost ratio 11.0 15.3 6.7 Marginal...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT