Question

Question 1 : calculate openness (%) of Sweden from 2003 to 2015.

Question 1 :

calculate openness (%) of Sweden from 2003 to 2015.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer:-

  Percentage of Openness is measured by the Openness Index, where

Openness Index = (Exports + Imports) / GDP

Using world Bank database, the following are computed.

Italy Sweden
2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015
Imports (US$ Billion) 566.796 569.203 494.802 227.405 233.644 202.601
Exports (US$ Billion) 614.915 630.598 548.504 253.493 258.408 226.808
GDP (US$ Billion) 2,130 2,152 1,833 578.742 573.818 497.918
Openness Index 55.48% 55.75% 56.92% 83.09% 85.75% 86.24%
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Please use the following information from the World Bank to calculate the percentage of openness for...
Please use the following information from the World Bank to calculate the percentage of openness for Italy and Sweden in 2003-2015: Imports of goods and services (in current US$) Exports of goods and services (in current US$) GDP (in current US$)
What is the Correlation Coefficient between Openness (as a percentage) and the GINI Index for Sweden....
What is the Correlation Coefficient between Openness (as a percentage) and the GINI Index for Sweden. Data have been attached. Year openness Gini index 2003 76.15% 25.3 2004 79.29% 26.1 2005 84.57% 26.8 2006 88.79% 26.4 2007 89.54% 27.1 2008 93.36% 28.1 2009 83.14% 27.3 2010 86.90% 27.7 2011 88.66% 27.6 2012 87.71% 27.6 2013 83.09% 28.8 2014 86.27% 28.4 2015 86.24% 29.2
What is the Correlation Coefficient between Openness (as a percentage) and the GINI Index for Italy?...
What is the Correlation Coefficient between Openness (as a percentage) and the GINI Index for Italy? DATA have been attached. Year Openness GINI Index 2003 46.25% 34.9 2004 47.55% 34.3 2005 49.40% 33.8 2006 53.28% 33.7 2007 55.21% 32.9 2008 54.71% 33.8 2009 45.61% 33.8 2010 52.25% 34.7 2011 55.59% 35.1 2012 56.18% 35.2 2013 55.48% 34.9 2014 55.75% 34.7 2015 56.92% 35.4
Question 1 On December 15, 2015, a public company receives an order from a customer for...
Question 1 On December 15, 2015, a public company receives an order from a customer for services to be performed on December 28, 2015. Due to a backlog of orders, the company does not perform the services until January 3, 2016. The customer pays for the services on January 6, 2016. When should revenue be recorded for the company? Why (support your argument with a principle from the textbook)?
Question 1 On December 15, 2015, a public company receives an order from a customer for...
Question 1 On December 15, 2015, a public company receives an order from a customer for services to be performed on December 28, 2015. Due to a backlog of orders, the company does not perform the services until January 3, 2016. The customer pays for the services on January 6, 2016. When should revenue be recorded for the company? Why (support your argument with a principle from the textbook)?
Suppose that Spain and Sweden both produce fish and wine. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a...
Suppose that Spain and Sweden both produce fish and wine. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 4 pounds of fish while Sweden's opportunity cost of producing a bottle of wine is 10 pounds of fish. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wine in the two countries, you can tell that ( spain or sweden ) has a comparative advantage in the production of wine and ( spain or sweden ) has a comparative advantage in...
Suppose that Portugal and Sweden both produce fish and olives. Portugal's opportunity cost of producing a...
Suppose that Portugal and Sweden both produce fish and olives. Portugal's opportunity cost of producing a crate of olives is 3 pounds of fish while Sweden's opportunity cost of producing a crate of olives is 9 pounds of fish. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing olives in the two countries, you can tell that ( portugal/ Sweden) has a comparative advantage in the production of olives and ( Portugal/ Sweden) has a comparative advantage in the production of fish....
On 1 May, an environmental tax on plastic bags was introduced in Sweden. The tax is...
On 1 May, an environmental tax on plastic bags was introduced in Sweden. The tax is 3 kronor per plastic bag and has made the plastic bags in grocery stores about twice as expensive as before. The tax has been criticized for being too high, since some say that the environmental benefits are not that large from using less plastic bags in Sweden. Assume a market with an environmental damage due to an negative external ef fect. Say that the...
On 1 May, an environmental tax on plastic bags was introduced in Sweden. The tax is...
On 1 May, an environmental tax on plastic bags was introduced in Sweden. The tax is 3 kronor per plastic bag and has made the plastic bags in grocery stores about twice as expensive as before. The tax has been criticized for being too high, since some say that the environmental benefits are not that large from using less plastic bags in Sweden. Assume a market with an environmental damage due to an negative external ef fect. Say that the...
Pisa Company acquired 75% of Siena Company on January 1, 2003 at book value. During 2003,...
Pisa Company acquired 75% of Siena Company on January 1, 2003 at book value. During 2003, Siena purchased inventory for $35,000 and sold it to Pisa for $50,000. Of this amount, Pisa reported $20,000 in ending inventory in 2003 and later sold it in 2004. In 2004, Pisa sold inventory it had purchased for $40,000 to Siena for $60,000. Siena sold $45,000 of this inventory in 2004. In 2004, Pisa reported stand-alone income of $550,000 and Siena reported total net...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT