Compare the following two alternatives by the IRR method, given MARR of 6%/year. First find if they are feasible and then compare them with the incremental rate of return (ROR).
Alt. |
Construction cost $ |
Benefits $/yr |
Salvage $ |
Service Life (yrs) |
A |
110,000 |
45,000 |
10,000 |
9 |
B |
275,000 |
75,000 |
-10,000 |
9 |
IRR for A
110000=45000(1-(1/1+r)^9)/(1-(1/1+r))+10000/(1+r)^9
IRR=38.97%
IRR for B
275000=75000(1-(1/1+r)^9)/(1-(1/1+r))-10000/(1+r)^9
IRR=22.86%
Hence both IRR are greater than MARR hence both alernatives are feasible
Lets Calculate Incrementa Cash Flow of B over A
IROR | 14% | |||
B | A | B-A | ||
0 | -275000 | -110000 | -165000 | |
1 | 75000 | 45000 | 30000 | 171382.5 |
2 | 75000 | 45000 | 30000 | -6382.52 |
3 | 75000 | 45000 | 30000 | 164999.9 |
4 | 75000 | 45000 | 30000 | |
5 | 75000 | 45000 | 30000 | |
6 | 75000 | 45000 | 30000 | |
7 | 75000 | 45000 | 30000 | |
8 | 75000 | 45000 | 30000 | |
9 | -10000 | 10000 | -20000 |
Change (IROR)=14%>MARR=12%
Hence B is preferred to A
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.