It is argued that import substitution is a misguided trade policy if the intent is to promote long-term economic growth. Explain the reasons underlying this argument and discuss this assertion using the following framework: Y↑ = C + I + G + (EXPORTS - ↓IMPORTS)
Please don't copy and paste from other websites. I can get those myself. Only answer if you have knowledge of the topic so we're not getting random answers that don't make sense.
Firstly let us know what is import substitution ( IS ) . It is a policy which advocates the replacement of foreign imports with domestic production . So by this policy import reduces and domestic production rises . This is shown by the equation : Y↑ = C + I + G + (EXPORTS - ↓IMPORTS) .
But if we dig deep we will find that it is a misguided trade policy . It does not promote long-term economic growth . We need to remember that trade heppens on the basis of comparative advantage . If imports are restricted then we lose gains from trade due to comparative advantage . This is an international loss . Also the domestic industries may not be efficient enough due to lack of foreign competition . So Imports (I) falls but Income or GDP (Y) , may not rise as much . So overall GDP declines . Thus in a way the economy shrinks in long run .
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.