Question

Compared to when marginal enforcement costs are ignored in the determination of efficient level of emissions,...

Compared to when marginal enforcement costs are ignored in the determination of
efficient level of emissions, inclusion of marginal enforcement costs would suggest

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Whenever emissions have to be reduced, it involves a few costs. The main costs are:

  • costs incurred by the polluting firms in order to reduce emissions
  • costs incurred by the government to impose the regulations

If these costs are ignored completely, the market will settle at a higher level of emissions and a lower cost of emission. In other words, firms will pollute more and they will ignore the external costs imposed on society.

To correct this, emissions have to be reduced. Higher is the level of abatement required, higher will be the marginal enforcement cost.

Thus, in brief:

Compared to when marginal enforcement costs are ignored in the determination of
efficient level of emissions, inclusion of marginal enforcement costs would suggest a higher cost of emissions and a lower level of emissions.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
In Mark A. Cohen, “The Costs and Benefits of Oil Spill Prevention and Enforcement,” Journal of...
In Mark A. Cohen, “The Costs and Benefits of Oil Spill Prevention and Enforcement,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Vol. 13 (June 1986), an attempt was made to quantify the marginal benefits and marginal costs of U.S. Coast Guard enforcement activity in the area of oil spill prevention. His analysis suggests (p. 185) that the marginal per-gallon benefit from the current level of enforcement activity is $7.50, while the marginal per-gallon cost is $5.50. Assuming these numbers are correct,...
Regulators are considering controlling the emissions from two local power plants. The marginal benefits (the demands...
Regulators are considering controlling the emissions from two local power plants. The marginal benefits (the demands for emissions) derived by these plants from being able to produce a given quantity of emissions are 400 − 10A for the first plant and 400 − 8B for the second plant. (a) Graph both of these marginal benefit curves, being careful to label your axes and intercepts. How much does each individual plant choose to emit in the absence of regulation? (b) Find...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2 = 100?1, where q1 and q2 are, respectively the amount of emissions abated for firm 1 and firm 2. Assume that with no control at all each firm would be abating 20 units of emissions or a total of 40 units for both firms. a) Calculate the marginal cost for abating 20 units of emissions for each firm. b) Calculate the cost-effective allocation of...
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions...
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $12·q1; MC2 = $4·q2, where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 40 units of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 80 tons), and assume that there are no significant transaction costs. 1) Compute...
Emissions (tons/month) Marginal Abatement Cost Total Abatement Cost Total Subsidy at $150/ton Total tax bill at...
Emissions (tons/month) Marginal Abatement Cost Total Abatement Cost Total Subsidy at $150/ton Total tax bill at $150/ton Total Costs 10 0 0 9 15 15 8 30 45 7 50 95 6 70 165 5 95 260 4 120 380 3 150 530 2 185 715 1 230 945 0 290 1,235 50. What optimal level of emissions would the above firm choose given the subsidy level detailed above? 51. If the above firm emits the optimal level of emissions...
Soal 13 Marginal cost is Select one: a. zero at the efficient level of production. b....
Soal 13 Marginal cost is Select one: a. zero at the efficient level of production. b. the total opportunity cost of producing all the units of the good. c. the same as the marginal benefit because producers benefit from the money they receive when they sell the good. d. the opportunity cost of producing one more unit.
Suppose powerplant emissions are linked to morbidity and mortality in humans who live downwind from the...
Suppose powerplant emissions are linked to morbidity and mortality in humans who live downwind from the powerplant. Suppose in recent years the daily load of emissions into the environment has averaged 4.0 million tons. Also suppose that since the generation of electricity is an important public service the Environmental Protection Agency is reluctant restrict electricity generation. A recent study compiled by the Green Party, an environmental organization, determined that the marginal benefits (in $’s per million tons) of abating emissions...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB = 35 − 0.5Q What is the efficient level of abatement? (d) What is the relationship between cost-effectiveness and efficiency? (e) What pollution tax would yield the efficient level of abatement you found in part (c)? If the pollution charge is levied on all units of emissions, how much revenue would the government receive? (f)...
Consider a good for which production generates external costs. Let the marginal external cost function be...
Consider a good for which production generates external costs. Let the marginal external cost function be MEC=aE, where a is 8, and E the quantity of emissions. The pollution can be abated at a cost. Let the marginal cost of abatement function be MCA=B-cE, where B is 26 and c is 3. a) Find the socially optimal level of emissions, and the optimal value of abatement costs and external costs. b) If an emission fee were levied on producers, what...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT