Question

**Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with
Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2,
respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i,
in tons.**

**The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by
30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each
firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for
allowance).**

**a) In a first moment assume polluters are not allowed to
trade, so each firm abates 60 units. What is the Marginal Abatement
Cost (MAC) and the Total Abatement Cost (TAC) for each
firm?**

**b) The government now allows polluters to trade permits, as
in cap-and-trade. What is the abatement level of each firm? In
other words, find X1 and X2 under this policy.**

**c) What are the “new” Total Abatement Costs (TAC1 and TAC2)
after the trade is allowed? Compare your answer with the situation
before the trade was allowed (part a). Did the overall Total
Abatement Cost (TAC1 + TAC2) increase or decrease?**

Answer #1

a)

Each firm is required to abate 60 units.

**MAC for firm 1=2X1=2*60=$120**

**MAC for firm 2=3X1=3*60=$180**

**Total abatement cost for firm 1 is given as**

**Total abatement cost for firm 2 is given as**

b)

In case X1+X2=120

or X2=120-X1

Set MAC1=MAC2 for cost minimization

2X1=3X2

2X1=3*(120-X1)

2X1=360-3X1

5X1=360

**X1=360/5=72 (abatement level for firm 1)**

**X2=120-X1=120-72 =48 (abatement level for firm
2)**

c)

Total abatement cost for firm 1 is given as

Total abatement cost for firm 2 is given as

**TAC after trade able
permits=5184+3456=$8640**

**TAC before trade able
permits=3600+5400=$9000**

**TAC has decreased after trade able permits are
issued.**

Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with
Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1
and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi
represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in
tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions
by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each
firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for
allowance).
What is the market price of SO2 abatement?
How many permits are traded between firms,...

Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by
incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1,
and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions
abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2
respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all,
firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release
10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of
abatement is...

1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region,
each of which generated 10 units of pollution for a total of 20
units released into the environment. The government determined that
emissions must be reduced by 12 units across the region to achieve
the ”socially desirable level of pollu- tion”. Each firm faces
different abatement cost conditions modelled as follows: for
Polluter 1, marginal abatement cost is MAC1 = 26- 2.6E1. For
Polluter 2, marginal abatement cost is...

Assume there are two polluting firms in two different cities. In
the business-as-usual outcome, Firm #1 would emit 20 units of
pollution (e1=20) and Firm #2 would emit 20 units of
pollution (e2=20).
Additionally, assume the marginal abatement costs for Firm #1
and Firm #2 are given below: MAC1 (x1) =
0.5x1 & MAC2
(x2) = 2x2
This pollutant is known to cause adverse health effects when in
high concentrations. Since the firms are in different cities,
assume the marginal social benefit...

marginal abatement cost curves for polluters 1 and 2 :
MAC1=10-e1 and MAC2=8-e1.
* How much does polluter 1 and polluter 2 pollute
without government intervention?
* This level of pollution should be reduced by 50%.
What are the marginal and total abatement costs of polluters 1 and
2 if a command and control policy is applied?
* What is the optimal outcome, or which allocation of
emissions minimize the abatement costs? Please calculate the total
abatement costs for the...

Assume the following marginal abatement cost curves for
polluters 1 and 2 : MAC1=10-e1 and
MAC2=8-e1.
1. How much does polluter 1 and polluter 2 pollute without
government intervention?
2. This level of pollution should be reduced by 50%. What are
the marginal and total abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2 if a
command and control policy is applied?
3. What is the optimal outcome, or which allocation of emissions
minimize the abatement costs? Please calculate the total abatement...

Environmental Economics
The table below shows the marginal
abatement costs of three firms for various levels of
emissions. Each firm is currently emitting 10 tons per week, so
total emissions are 30 tons per week. Suppose we wish to reduce
total emissions by 50 percent, to 15 tons per week.
Emissions
(tons/week)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Marginal abatement costs ($/ton):
Firm A
0
1
2
3
6
10
14
18
23
30
38...

Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement
for firm 1 is MC1 =
e1 + 300, and the marginal cost of
abatement for firm 2 is MC2 =
3e2, where e1 and
e2 are the tons of pollution abatement by firms 1
and 2, respectively. Baseline pollution levels are
bl1 = 2000 and
bl2 = 2000.
Suppose the government sets a pollution reduction goal of 1600
total units of abatement.
Write down two equations that ensure that the...

Assume you have three firms with different marginal abatement
cost functions as follows: MAC1 =2q1
MAC2 =q2 MAC3 = 12q3
It has been determined that the total amount of pollution should
be reduced by 35 units.
(a) Find the cost-effective allocation of pollution abatement
for each firm.

Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport,
Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each
firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and
MC2= 45e2, where e1and
e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the
first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of
government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions
and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions.
Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution
by 400 units. If...

ADVERTISEMENT

Get Answers For Free

Most questions answered within 1 hours.

ADVERTISEMENT

asked 3 seconds ago

asked 3 seconds ago

asked 1 minute ago

asked 1 minute ago

asked 1 minute ago

asked 3 minutes ago

asked 5 minutes ago

asked 5 minutes ago

asked 5 minutes ago

asked 5 minutes ago

asked 6 minutes ago

asked 7 minutes ago