Question

Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...

  1. Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions.
  1. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If they decide to set a performance standard of 200 units of reduction per firm, what is the total cost to each of the firms?
  2. In order to be cost effective, how much should each firm cut its pollution (to reach the 400 unit goal together)?
  3. What emissions fee should be imposed to achieve the cost-effective outcome?
  4. Suppose that instead of an emissions fee, the regulatory agency introduces a tradable permit system and issues 600 permits, each of which allows the emission of one unit of pollution. Firm 2 uses its political influence to convince the regulatory agency to issue 500 permits to itself and only 100 permits to Firm 1. How many, if any, permits are traded between the firms?
  5. Under this cap-and-trade system, what is the minimum amount of money that must be paid (total) for these permits?
  6. If the Shreveport regulators expect that Firm 2’s MC of pollution reduction might increase to MC2’ = 57e2 should they implement the emissions fee or cap-and-trade system. Support your answer fully.
  7. Assume the government sets the pollution reduction goal by comparing the Marginal Social Benefit (MSB) of pollution reduction to the societal Marginal Cost (MC) of pollution reduction. Suppose that MC = 40e before firm 2’s MC goes up, and it equals MC’ = 50e after. What must be true about MSB if the emissions fee’s use results in an amount of pollution reduction closer to the optimal (post increase) than a cap-and-trade system. Explain fully and feel free to make up an appropriate equation for MSB to justify your answer.

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB = 35 − 0.5Q What is the efficient level of abatement? (d) What is the relationship between cost-effectiveness and efficiency? (e) What pollution tax would yield the efficient level of abatement you found in part (c)? If the pollution charge is levied on all units of emissions, how much revenue would the government receive? (f)...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). What is the market price of SO2 abatement? How many permits are traded between firms,...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1 + 300, and the marginal cost of abatement for firm 2 is MC2 = 3e2, where e1 and e2 are the tons of pollution abatement by firms 1 and 2, respectively. Baseline pollution levels are bl1 = 2000 and bl2 = 2000. Suppose the government sets a pollution reduction goal of 1600 total units of abatement. Write down two equations that ensure that the...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). a) In a first moment assume polluters are not allowed to trade, so each firm...
In a different part of the world there a two different firms: Firm A and Firm...
In a different part of the world there a two different firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 100 tons of pollution. Firm A faces marginal abatement cost MACA = 5A and Firm B faces marginal abatement cost MACB = 2A where A is tons of pollution abatement. The government’s control authority wishes the firms to reduce total emissions to 130 tons using the Cap and Trade system and plans to initially give each firm half...
A firm’s marginal cost of abatement is MAC = 3A. One unit of output generates one...
A firm’s marginal cost of abatement is MAC = 3A. One unit of output generates one unit of emissions. Suppose that its baseline (unregulated) emissions level is 100 units. Also suppose that profits are so high that the firm will always produce at its capacity of 100 units regardless of whatever policies below are implemented. (a) Suppose the government imposes a regulation that the firm cannot emit more than 50 units. How much will the firm abate? (b) A team...
Suppose that two power plants each releases 200 units of toxic air into the atmosphere per...
Suppose that two power plants each releases 200 units of toxic air into the atmosphere per year. Both firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Let Q denote the amount of pollution reduction. Firm A’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are M C = 2Q − 20. Firm B’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MC = 3Q. The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is MB = 240. (a) What is the socially...
Suppose there are two firms producing coal. Coal sells at a constant price p = $60/ton....
Suppose there are two firms producing coal. Coal sells at a constant price p = $60/ton. Each firm, i, has private marginal cost PMCi = 5 + 1.1qi, where qi is the quantity of coal firm i produces in tons, and the units of PMCi are $/ton. Each ton of coal produced creates 10 lbs of SO2 pollution. a) Suppose there is a cap-and-trade system for SO2 emissions in this coal industry. If the regulator sets the cap at 800...
A pollution offset provides a.a charge for total emissions b.a positive incentive to encourage firms to...
A pollution offset provides a.a charge for total emissions b.a positive incentive to encourage firms to reduce emissions beyond the required amount c.an incentive payment to increase emissions d.the same incentive to reduce emissions as a pollution tax Buying and selling of pollution permits can be set up as a a.deposit-refund system b.two-part tariff c.cap-and-trade d.all of the above Emissions rate trading a.is effectively the same as cap-and-trade b.sets an overall limit on allowable emissions c.regulates emissions in relation to...