This dichotomy between great leaders and terrible leaders brings to mind this question: does the resolution of an issue such as the one we are discussing here depend on the "right" leader being available at the "right" time to resolve these issues? Does political leadership determine whether peaceful solutions or violent outcomes result? Provide examples to support your analysis.
Yes, the resolution of an issue depend on the "right" leader being available at the "right" time to resolve these issues. THis actually differenciate great leader from a terible one. It the situation which generates the leader in a person. How he manages the his follower is anart which makes him leader. The right time and the right decision during that time tells about the competency he has as a leader.
The collaborative leadership style really helps in this. Hence I believe that the time and the decision during that time results into a good leader.
Yes the poilitical leadership also determines whether peaceful solutions or violent outcomes result. How a leader's ideology is , likely to change the country. For example Gandhiji in India was a peaceful solver hence he got his person done using non violence, whereas Hitler was a violence oriented person which won the battle using violence.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.