Question

Nearly all of Seattle’s soda tax is being passed on to consumers, new report shows Stores...

Nearly all of Seattle’s soda tax is being passed on to consumers, new report shows

Stores across the city have passed on the cost of Seattle’s soda tax to consumers, a new study shows. (Ken Lambert / The Seattle Times)

The city collected nearly $17 million in the first nine months of the tax — and officials are counting on the money to keep rolling in.


By Daniel Beekman

Seattle Times staff reporter

Nearly 100 percent of Seattle’s new tax on the distribution of sweetened beverages has been passed on to consumers through higher in-store prices, a new report estimates.

But some taxed beverages have increased in price more than others and some stores have increased their prices more than others, according to the report by University of Washington researchers that City Council members are set to discuss Wednesday.

Sodas have increased in price more than sugar-sweetened juices and bottled coffee drinks, and smaller stores have increased their prices more than supermarkets, the report indicates.

Additionally, some smaller stores have increased their prices even for beverages not subject to the tax, such as diet sodas.

“We don’t know why, but they did see something similar in Berkeley,” the California city that adopted a tax before Seattle, said research-team leader Jesse Jones-Smith, an associate professor of health services and epidemiology.

Seattle’s tax of 1.75 cents per fluid ounce, which took effect in January 2018, is charged to distributors of sugar-sweetened beverages. But the distributors can pass the tax on to stores and the stores can pass the tax on to consumers.

When the City Council approved the tax in 2017, many proponents said the goal was to decrease consumption of unhealthful beverages by driving up prices, while others supported the policy because they said it would raise money for healthful-eating and education programs.

Foes said the tax would disproportionately hurt people with low incomes. Some store owners and consumers opposed the measure, along with unionized beverage-industry workers.

The city collected nearly $17 million in the first nine months of the tax, surpassing its initial expectations, and officials now are counting on the money to keep rolling in, with substantial annual declines no longer anticipated.

The UW researchers surveyed prices for various beverage types at more than 200 Seattle stores of various types in fall 2017, before the tax, and in summer 2018, after the tax.

To isolate the impact of the tax, they used more than 200 stores in Kent, Auburn and Federal Way as a control group.

Across all beverages and Seattle stores surveyed, an average of 1.70 cents per fluid ounce — or 97 percent of the tax of 1.75 cents per ounce — was passed on to consumers, according to the study.

For soda, the average pass-through rate was 102 percent, and for sugar-sweetened teas and sports drinks, it was 84 percent.

For sugar-sweetened juice drinks, it was only 63 percent, and for sugar-sweetened bottled coffee drinks, it was 62 percent.

At small stores, the pass-through rate was 104 percent, while at supermarkets and superstores, it was only 86 percent.

The researchers have some guesses about why the tax impacted different beverages and stores differently, but the report doesn’t include explanations.

“The most important finding is that in the large grocery stores most of the tax is being passed through,” Jones-Smith said.

At small stores, the average pass-through rate for non-taxed beverages such as diet soda and chocolate milk was 44 percent, while at supermarkets and superstores, it was 0 percent.

The researchers didn’t survey some popular stores that devote little shelf space to sugary beverages, such as Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s and PCC Community Markets.

The UW team also is studying attitudes toward the tax, impacts on sales and changes in consumption by low-income children.

State voters recently approved a ballot measure meant to block other Washington cities from also enacting soda taxes.

Daniel Beekman: 206-464-2164 or [email protected]; on Twitter: @dbeekman. Seattle Times staff reporter Daniel Beekman covers Seattle city government and local politics.

Briefly explain what the city council failed to understand. Who ends up paying the tax? Was this the intent? The city council doesn't understand what economic concept? Explain.


Homework Answers

Answer #1

The consumers ended up paying the tax. This was not the intent, as they only wanted to reduce the consumption of unhealthy soda drinks and beverages. Although this somewhat reduces the consumption, it doesn't collect any tax from the producers. Their intent was to shift the supply curve upwards(raising costs via tax and decreasing supply at a given price) but it ended by in shifting the demand curve downwards(the tax passed onto consumers reduced demand), in the soda market.

The main economic concept here is elasticity. Many of the producers had inelastic supply curves, and hence they were able to pass the tax directly onto the consumers while paying little to no tax at all.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Read the article then answer the question below: Philadelphia’s Soda Tax Goes to Court: What You...
Read the article then answer the question below: Philadelphia’s Soda Tax Goes to Court: What You Need to Know The city is once again ground zero in the fight over taxing sugary drinks WSJ.com Should sodas and sugary drinks be subjected to a special tax? Philadelphia has become ground zero in the national debate over whether to tax sodas and other sugar-sweetened beverages. On Tuesday, Pennsylvania’s highest state court is set to hear a challenge by the American Beverage Association...
Read the NY Fed's section and write a memo summarizing the details of the report. Summary...
Read the NY Fed's section and write a memo summarizing the details of the report. Summary of Economic Activity Economic activity in the Second District continued to grow at a moderate pace in the latest reporting period, and the labor market has remained tight. Input prices increased at a slightly faster pace, while selling prices continued to rise modestly. Fairly robust growth was reported in most service and distribution industries. Manufacturers reported that growth has slowed somewhat from its rapid...
In February 2012, the Pepsi Next product was launched into the US market. This case study...
In February 2012, the Pepsi Next product was launched into the US market. This case study provides students with an interesting insight into PepsiCo’s new product process and some of the challenging decisions that they faced along the way. Pepsi Next Case Study Introduction Pepsi Next was launched by PepsiCo into the US market in February 2012, and has since been rolled out to various international markets (for instance, it was launched in Australia in September 2012). The new product...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT