Question

The ___________ occurs when the government sets a quantitative goal of pollution reduction and it is...

The ___________ occurs when the government sets a quantitative goal of pollution reduction and it is a cost ______ method of pollution reduction.

Tax: Efficient

Command and Control: Inefficient

Command and Control: Efficient

Cap and Trade: Inefficient

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The answer is B

Command-and-control regulation is a regulatory measure or method which sets some specific limits for pollution emission and/or mandates that specific pollution control technologies must be used to curb the pollution.

Its three shortcomings are :
• It provide no incentive for going beyond the limits they set.
• It offers limited flexibility on where and how to reduce pollution.
• It often has politically-motivated loopholes.
These three shortcomings make it an inefficient measure as as compared to the cap and trade which provides incentives.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Question 1 A pollution tax allows regulators to set the __________of pollution in a given geographic...
Question 1 A pollution tax allows regulators to set the __________of pollution in a given geographic area. 10 points    Question 2 If a government chooses a scheme of pollution control using marketable permits as a main tool to manage the environment, then the reduction in pollution __________. will take place in the firms where the cost of doing so is the least expensive should take place in every firm based on the length of time the firm has to comply...
Question 1 A pollution tax allows regulators to set the __________of pollution in a given geographic...
Question 1 A pollution tax allows regulators to set the __________of pollution in a given geographic area. 10 points    Question 2 If a government chooses a scheme of pollution control using marketable permits as a main tool to manage the environment, then the reduction in pollution __________. will take place in the firms where the cost of doing so is the least expensive should take place in every firm based on the length of time the firm has to comply...
To reduce the level of pollution emitted by firms in an industry, the government could use...
To reduce the level of pollution emitted by firms in an industry, the government could use a cap-and-trade policy or a carbon tax (where the government taxes carbon producers based on the amount of carbon produced). Which of the following is true? Choose one: A. The price of the good sold will rise under either policy, and there will be a reduction in the level of production. B. The quantity of the good sold will fall under either policy, but...
9. Which of the following is a difference between corrective taxes and tradable pollution permits? a....
9. Which of the following is a difference between corrective taxes and tradable pollution permits? a. Corrective taxes are a market-based solution while tradable pollution permits are a command-and-control policy. b. With a corrective tax the government sets the price of pollution; with tradable pollution permits, demand and supply set the price of pollution. c. With corrective taxes firms pay for pollution; with tradable pollution permits firms do not. d. Corrective taxes internalize the pollution externality while tradable pollution permits...
11. Classify the following pollution-control policies as command-and-control or market incentive based: a. A state emissions...
11. Classify the following pollution-control policies as command-and-control or market incentive based: a. A state emissions tax on the quantity of carbon emitted by each firm. b. The federal government requires domestic auto companies to improve car emissions by 2020. c. The EPA sets national standards for water quality. d. A city sells permits to firms that allow them to emit a specified quantity of pollution. e. The federal government pays fishermen to preserve salmon.
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each...
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs,...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB = 35 − 0.5Q What is the efficient level of abatement? (d) What is the relationship between cost-effectiveness and efficiency? (e) What pollution tax would yield the efficient level of abatement you found in part (c)? If the pollution charge is levied on all units of emissions, how much revenue would the government receive? (f)...
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions...
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $12·q1; MC2 = $4·q2, where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 40 units of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 80 tons), and assume that there are no significant transaction costs. 1) Compute...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total...