Question

MACa = 400 – E, MACb = 300 – E, and MACc = 200 – E....

MACa = 400 – E, MACb = 300 – E, and MACc = 200 – E. MD = 2E/3, where MAC is Marginal Abatement Cost, MD is marginal damages, and E is emissions.

The regulator is currently using uniform standards to regulate the firms to 270 units of emissions
collectively. (All else equal) What is the Net Social Benefit of switching to individualized
standards?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

MD or marginal damage can be explained as marginal benefit of shortening emissions or damages preserved. whereas MAC or marginal abatement cost is the cost of reducing emissions.

The efficient level of emissions which is the level of emission maximizing social net benefits where MD=MAC.

For each alternative firms a,b,c to reduce emissions , the net social benefits of switching to any of these individual standards rather using uniform standard to regulate firms to emit 270units collectively will be preferred if it can emit less than the standard units.

for firm a, MACa=MD

400-E=2E/3

E=240units

for firm b, MACb=MD

300-E=2E/3

E=180units

for firm c, MACc=MD

200-E=2E/3

E=120units

Each firms emits less than the uniform standard while firm c emits least so switching to its standard will maximize net social benefit.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
MAC = 90 – E and Marginal Damages is MD = 30 + 2E, where E...
MAC = 90 – E and Marginal Damages is MD = 30 + 2E, where E is measured in tonnes. 19) Suppose the Chemical Company owns the river. Begin by assuming there has not been any agreement. The Fishery offers the Chemical Company $50 per tonne of abatement, and the Chemical Company agrees. What will be resulting Net Social Benefit (NSB) of the agreement?
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as...
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as follows: MAC1 = 160 − 4E1 MAC2 = 100 − E2 (E1 and E2 represent the respective amounts of emissions in litres.) a-)What are the marginal abatement cost curves of these two firms as a function of their abatement? b-)What would the industry-wide emissions be after 40 litres of abatement? c-)Calculate the industry total cost of abatement if each firm abates 20 litres. d-)Derive...
Consider a "market for pollution'' where the marginal abatement cost is given by ???(?)=300−2?MAC(e)=300−2e and the...
Consider a "market for pollution'' where the marginal abatement cost is given by ???(?)=300−2?MAC(e)=300−2e and the marginal social cost of emissions is constant at $20$20 per tonnes of emissions. ?e is measured in tons of emissions. a) (4) What would be the unregulated market amount of emissions? b) (4) What is the socially efficient amount of emissions? c) (3) Compute the deadweight loss from the unregulated emissions externality. d) (4) Give two policies, implied by this model, that can generate...
The marginal damages associated with an air pollutant are MD = (3/5)E. A single Firm is...
The marginal damages associated with an air pollutant are MD = (3/5)E. A single Firm is the sole source of the pollutant. The marginal abatement costs of the Firm are MAC = 200-(2/5)E. (a) Determine the socially optimal level of emissions for the Firm and describe both (i) an Emission Standard, E^ and (ii) an Emission Tax, tE that will bring about the social optimum. (b) Suppose that if the Firm undertakes research and development there is a very high...
A fishery and a Chemical Company are both operating on the river. Marginal Abatement Cost is...
A fishery and a Chemical Company are both operating on the river. Marginal Abatement Cost is MAC = 90 – E and Marginal Damages is MD = 30 + 2E, where E is measured in tonnes. 19) Suppose the Chemical Company owns the river. Begin by assuming there has not been any agreement. The Fishery offers the Chemical Company $50 per tonne of abatement, and the Chemical Company agrees. What will be resulting Net Social Benefit (NSB) of the agreement?...
Two firms, Firm A and Firm B, have the following marginal abatement cost functions: MACA =...
Two firms, Firm A and Firm B, have the following marginal abatement cost functions: MACA = 180-3EA and MACB = 100 - 2EB. A new emission control program requires them to reduce the total or combined emissions to 80 units. To achieve this, the regulator provides Firm A with 45 transferable discharge permits and Firm B with 35 initially. Suppose that one permit allows one unit of emissions, and that the market for permits is competitive. In equilibrium, (a)how many...
Two firms, Firm A and Firm B, have the following marginal abatement cost functions: MACA =...
Two firms, Firm A and Firm B, have the following marginal abatement cost functions: MACA = 180-3EA and MACB = 100 - 2EB. A new emission control program requires them to reduce the total or combined emissions to 80 units. To achieve this, the regulator provides Firm A with 45 transferable discharge permits and Firm B with 35 initially. Suppose that one permit allows one unit of emissions, and that the market for permits is competitive. In equilibrium, (a)how many...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). a) In a first moment assume polluters are not allowed to trade, so each firm...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT