Payoffs below are in millions of dollars
Firm B
Strategy 1 Strategy 2
Strategy 1: 23, 24 25, 27
Firm A
Strategy 2: 26, 30 21, 32
5. (2 pts.) In this single shot simultaneous play game, identify any and all Nash equilibria.
6. (2 pts.) Suppose Firm B has the option of going first, i.e. being a first mover in a sequential game with the above payoffs. To go first though, Firm B will incur a cost of $2 million dollars. If firm B chooses not to go first, then it returns to the simultaneous play game as before in #4. Should Firm B
chose to go first or not? Carefully explain why or why not.
_____________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
For question 6, here is the scenario to get question 4:
Firm B
Strategy 1 Strategy 2
Strategy 1: 28, 28 15, 35
Firm A
Strategy 2: 35, 15 20, 20
2. (2 pts.) Does Firm A have a dominant strategy? _______If yes, which strategy? _________
(yes or no)
3. (2 pts.) Does Firm B have a dominant strategy? _______If so, which strategy? _________
(yes or no)
4. (2 pts.) Are there any Nash equilibria? If there are any Nash equilibria, identify any and all of them.
(5)
When Firm B chooses Strategy 1, Firm A's best strategy is Strategy 2 since payoff is higher (26 > 23).
When Firm B chooses Strategy 2, Firm A's best strategy is Strategy 1 since payoff is higher (25 > 21).
When Firm A chooses Strategy 1, Firm B's best strategy is Strategy 2 since payoff is higher (27 > 24).
When Firm A chooses Strategy 2, Firm B's best strategy is Strategy 2 since payoff is higher (32 > 30).
Therefore, Nash equilibrium is: (Firm A chooses Strategy 1, Firm B chooses Strategy 2) [See below].
NOTE: As per Answering Policy, 1st question is answered.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.