Question

Payoffs below are in millions of dollars                                    &nb

Payoffs below are in millions of dollars              

                                                                          Firm B                      

                                                          Strategy 1        Strategy 2

                                                                          

                                        Strategy 1:   23, 24                25, 27                                   

                        Firm A                                                     

                                        Strategy 2:   26, 30               21, 32                                               

                                                

             5. (2 pts.) In this single shot simultaneous play game, identify any and all Nash equilibria.

            

6. (2 pts.) Suppose Firm B has the option of going first, i.e. being a first mover in a sequential game with the above payoffs. To go first though, Firm B will incur a cost of $2 million dollars. If firm B chooses not to go first, then it returns to the simultaneous play game as before in #4. Should Firm B

chose to go first or not? Carefully explain why or why not.  

                            _____________________________________________________________________________       

            ________________________________________________________________________________        

________________________________________________________________________________

For question 6, here is the scenario to get question 4:

Firm B                      

                                                          Strategy 1 Strategy 2

                                                                          

Strategy 1: 28, 28 15, 35                        

Firm A                                                     

Strategy 2: 35, 15 20, 20                                    

                                                

            2. (2 pts.) Does Firm A have a dominant strategy? _______If yes, which strategy? _________

                                                                           (yes or no)

            3. (2 pts.) Does Firm B have a dominant strategy? _______If so, which strategy? _________

                                                                           (yes or no)    

                        

4. (2 pts.) Are there any Nash equilibria? If there are any Nash equilibria, identify any and all of them.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(5)

When Firm B chooses Strategy 1, Firm A's best strategy is Strategy 2 since payoff is higher (26 > 23).

When Firm B chooses Strategy 2, Firm A's best strategy is Strategy 1 since payoff is higher (25 > 21).

When Firm A chooses Strategy 1, Firm B's best strategy is Strategy 2 since payoff is higher (27 > 24).

When Firm A chooses Strategy 2, Firm B's best strategy is Strategy 2 since payoff is higher (32 > 30).

Therefore, Nash equilibrium is: (Firm A chooses Strategy 1, Firm B chooses Strategy 2) [See below].

NOTE: As per Answering Policy, 1st question is answered.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Firm B Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 1: 24, 24 14, 30 Firm A Strategy 2:...
Firm B Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 1: 24, 24 14, 30 Firm A Strategy 2: 30, 14 20, 20 1. (2 pts.) Does Firm A have a dominant strategy? _Yes_ If yes, which strategy? _Strategy 1_ 2. (2 pts.) Does Firm B have a dominant strategy? _No__ If so, which strategy? _ 3. (3 pts.)Are there any Nash equilibria? If there are any Nash equilibria, identify any and all of them.
Suppose that the NFL and the NFL Players Association are negotiating on a new collective bargaining...
Suppose that the NFL and the NFL Players Association are negotiating on a new collective bargaining agreement. Each side has the options to either be mean or be nice in negotiations. Suppose we model the game as a simultaneous move game, depicted in the game box below. Note: The payoffs below are depicted as: (NFL payoff, Players Association payoff) The Players Association Be Mean Be Nice The NFL Be Mean 15, 0 20, 10 Be Nice 10, 20 30, 15...
Two firms are competing in prices. Each has two strategies: undercut and cooperate. The firms’ payoffs...
Two firms are competing in prices. Each has two strategies: undercut and cooperate. The firms’ payoffs are provided in the matrix below Undercut Firm 1 Cooperate Firm 2 Undercut Cooperate 100, 100 1000, 0 0, 1000 500, 500 (a) (3 points) Assume the firms make their decisions at the same time, and the firms’ competition lasts for one year. Does Firm 1 have a dominant strategy? Does Firm 2 have a dominant strategy? Find the Nash equilibrium. 2 (b) (2...
2) A football team has the chance of scoring the game-winning touchdown on the last play...
2) A football team has the chance of scoring the game-winning touchdown on the last play of the game. It can either run or pass. The defense can play for the run or play for the pass. The following normal form lists the payoffs from the game made up by this last play. The payoffs are probabilities of winning the game. Defense Defend Pass Defend Run Offense Pass 0, 1 1, 0 Run 1, 0 0, 1 Does the team...
Two firms play the game below. Each must choose strategy 1 or 2. They choose their...
Two firms play the game below. Each must choose strategy 1 or 2. They choose their strategies simultaneously and without cooperating with each other. Firm A?'s payoffs are on the left side of each? cell, and Firm B?'s payoffs are on the right. Firm A Firm B Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 1 10, 16 8, 12 Strategy 2 13, 12 17, 10 Determine the dominant strategy for each firm. 1) For Firm A : A. Strategy 1 is a...
The matrix below shows payoffs in a stag hunt game. If both hunters hunt stag, each...
The matrix below shows payoffs in a stag hunt game. If both hunters hunt stag, each gets a payoff of 4. If both hunt hare, each gets 3. If one hunts stag and the other hunts hare, the stag hunter gets 0 and the hare hunter gets 3. Hunter B hunt stag hunt hare hunt stag 4,4 0,3 Hunter A hunt hare 3,0 3,3 (a) If you are sure that the other hunter will hunt stag, what is the best...
QUESTION 3 Below is a game between player A and player B. Each player has two...
QUESTION 3 Below is a game between player A and player B. Each player has two possible strategies: 1 or 2. The payoffs for each combination of strategies between A and B are in the bracket. For example, if A plays 1 and B plays 1, the payoff for A is -3 and the payoff for B is -2. Player B Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Player A Strategy 1 (-3,-2) (10,0) Strategy 2 (0,8) (0,0) How many pure strategy Nash...
Consider the following one-shot simultaneous game: Firm 2 Advertising campaign Do nothing Firm 1 Advertising campain...
Consider the following one-shot simultaneous game: Firm 2 Advertising campaign Do nothing Firm 1 Advertising campain 3, 8 20, 8 Offer discounts 6, 8 9, 2 Do nothing 7, 10 9, 12 a. State all the dominated strategies in the game, by which strategy they are dominated, and whether weakly or strictly. b. What is the equilibrium outcome by dominance (by elimination of dominated strategies), if any? c. What is (or are) the pure strategy Nash equilibria of this game?
Mike and Jake are basketball players who sometimes flop (that is, intentionally fall or feign an...
Mike and Jake are basketball players who sometimes flop (that is, intentionally fall or feign an injury in order to cause a foul on another player). It is better for each of them if both play fairly and don't flop then when both flop. But each player is better off flopping than not flopping. Their payoffs are given below. Jake Mike Flop Not Flop Flop (3, 3) (4, 1) Not Flop (1, 4) (1, 1) For instance, if Mike flops...
Below is a game between player A and player B. Each player has two possible strategies:...
Below is a game between player A and player B. Each player has two possible strategies: 1 or 2. The payoffs for each combination of strategies between A and B are in the bracket. For example, if A plays 1 and B plays 1, the payoff for A is 1 and the payoff for B is 0. Player B Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Player A Strategy 1 (1,0) (0,1) Strategy 2 (0,1) (1,0) How many pure strategy Nash equilibria does...