Question

The two mutually exclusive alternatives, as security systems for a local visitor center, are under consideration....

The two mutually exclusive alternatives, as security systems for a local visitor center, are under consideration. The data related to these systems is as follows:

System 1

System 2

First Cost, $

$350,000

$275,000

Annual O&M, $/year

$7,000

$5,000

Benefits, $/year

$125,000

$105,000

Disbenefits, $/year

$15,000

$20,000

Savage value, $

$10,000

$7,000

Useful life

25

20

Which security system do you recommend based on a B-C ratio analysis? The interest rate is 7% per year.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Arranging alternative in increasing order of initial cost

DN < 2 < 1

B/C of (2-DN) = (105000 - 20000) / (275000*(A/P,7%,20) + 5000 - 7000*(A/F,7%,20))

= (105000 - 20000) / (275000*0.094393 + 5000 - 7000*0.024393)

= 2.76

As incremental B/C is more than 1, system 2 is selected

B/C of (1 - 2) = ((125000-15000) - (105000 - 20000)) / ((350000*(A/P,7%,25) + 7000 - 10000*(A/F,7%,25)) - (275000*(A/P,7%,20) + 5000 - 7000*(A/F,7%,20)))c

= ((125000-15000) - (105000 - 20000)) / ((350000*0.085811 + 7000 - 10000*0.015811) - (275000*0.094393 + 5000 - 7000*0.024393))

= 4.11

As incremental B/C is more than 1, system 1 is selected

Finally system 1 must be selected

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program.The alternatives...
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program.The alternatives are: A   B C Installed cost $10,000 $15,000 $ 20,000 Annual benefit 1625 1530 1890   Useful life (Years) 10 20 20 The salvage value of each alternative is zero.At the end of 10 years Alternative A could be replaced with another A with identical cost and benefits . a)Which alternative should be selected if interest is 6% b)3% c)If there is a difference between...
A company is considering 3 mutually exclusive alternatives along with "Do-Nothing" as part of a new...
A company is considering 3 mutually exclusive alternatives along with "Do-Nothing" as part of a new quality improvement initiative. The alternatives are in the table below. For each alternative, the salvage value at the end of the useful life is zero. At the end of 10 years, Alternative Z can be replaced by another Z with identical costs and benefits. If the MARR is 6.5 %, and the analysis period is 20 years, which alternative should be selected? X Y...
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives​ (one must be​ chosen). The...
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives​ (one must be​ chosen). The MARR is 4​% per year. Lead Acid Lithium Ion Capital investment ​$5,000 ​$13,000 Annual expenses ​$2,250 ​$2,500 Useful life 12 years 18 years Market value at end of useful life ​$0 ​$2,600 LOADING... Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when i=4​% per year. Determine which alternative should be selected if the repeatability assumption applies. The AW of...
Final Finishing is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for a new polisher. Each alternative has an...
Final Finishing is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for a new polisher. Each alternative has an expected life of 10 years and no salvage value. Polisher 1 requires an initial investment of $20,000 and provides annual benefits of $4,465. Polisher 2 requires an initial investment of $10,000 and provides annual benefits of $1,770. Polisher 3 requires an initial investment of $15,000 and provides annual benefits of $3,580. MARR is 15%/year. Show the comparisons and internal rates of return used to...
Consider a proposal to invest $8.55 million into a stretch of wild river preservation in Wyoming....
Consider a proposal to invest $8.55 million into a stretch of wild river preservation in Wyoming. The project would require periodic capital expenditures as well as annual maintenance expenditures. Benefits from river restoration range from current recreational use to flood prevention to potential future fishing and floating benefits as well as societal benefits from knowing wild stretches of river exist and will be passed on to future generations. Following current best practices for benefit estimation, the following set of costs...