Question

Consider a "market for pollution'' where the marginal abatement cost is given by ???(?)=300−2?MAC(e)=300−2e and the...

Consider a "market for pollution'' where the marginal abatement cost is given by ???(?)=300−2?MAC(e)=300−2e and the marginal social cost of emissions is constant at $20$20 per tonnes of emissions. ?e is measured in tons of emissions.

a) (4) What would be the unregulated market amount of emissions?

b) (4) What is the socially efficient amount of emissions?

c) (3) Compute the deadweight loss from the unregulated emissions externality.

d) (4) Give two policies, implied by this model, that can generate the socially efficient amount of emissions.

Business   Economics   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as...
Suppose that there are two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves as follows: MAC1 = 160 − 4E1 MAC2 = 100 − E2 (E1 and E2 represent the respective amounts of emissions in litres.) a-)What are the marginal abatement cost curves of these two firms as a function of their abatement? b-)What would the industry-wide emissions be after 40 litres of abatement? c-)Calculate the industry total cost of abatement if each firm abates 20 litres. d-)Derive...
MAC = 90 – E and Marginal Damages is MD = 30 + 2E, where E...
MAC = 90 – E and Marginal Damages is MD = 30 + 2E, where E is measured in tonnes. 19) Suppose the Chemical Company owns the river. Begin by assuming there has not been any agreement. The Fishery offers the Chemical Company $50 per tonne of abatement, and the Chemical Company agrees. What will be resulting Net Social Benefit (NSB) of the agreement?
Suppose the marginal cost of abatement for a airborne pollutant is MC= 4X, where X is...
Suppose the marginal cost of abatement for a airborne pollutant is MC= 4X, where X is measured in tons, and the marginal benefit of abatement is 500 - X. The maximum abatement (reducing pollution to zero) is XMAX= 500. a) Graph the MC and MB curves and show the efficienct level of abatement X* on the graph. b) Calculate the efficient level of abatement X* c) Suppose there is no abatement (X=0, which implies no actions are made to remove...
A firm’s marginal cost of abatement is MAC = 3A. One unit of output generates one...
A firm’s marginal cost of abatement is MAC = 3A. One unit of output generates one unit of emissions. Suppose that its baseline (unregulated) emissions level is 100 units. Also suppose that profits are so high that the firm will always produce at its capacity of 100 units regardless of whatever policies below are implemented. (a) Suppose the government imposes a regulation that the firm cannot emit more than 50 units. How much will the firm abate? (b) A team...
Suppose a society has the following marginal abatement cost (MAC) and marginal damage (MD) functions MAC...
Suppose a society has the following marginal abatement cost (MAC) and marginal damage (MD) functions MAC = 140 – 4E MD = 3E Where E denotes the level of pollution. a) What is the unregulated level of pollution? b) What is the optimal level of pollution? Sketch the MAC and MD functions and show the optimal level of pollution in the diagram. c) Find the per-unit pollution tax that would achieve the optimal level of pollution. Show the level of...
Suppose a control authority is trying to design a cost-effective pollution control policy. They assume the...
Suppose a control authority is trying to design a cost-effective pollution control policy. They assume the aggregate marginal abatement cost is given as MAC = 16 –q and the marginal pollution damage is given as MD = 3q where q is the total amount of emissions. Calculate the socially efficient level of emissions. Use a diagram to explain why the profit-maximising level of emissions and socially efficient level of emissions are different. Suppose the control authority tries to achieve the...
A fishery and a Chemical Company are both operating on the river. Marginal Abatement Cost is...
A fishery and a Chemical Company are both operating on the river. Marginal Abatement Cost is MAC = 90 – E and Marginal Damages is MD = 30 + 2E, where E is measured in tonnes. 19) Suppose the Chemical Company owns the river. Begin by assuming there has not been any agreement. The Fishery offers the Chemical Company $50 per tonne of abatement, and the Chemical Company agrees. What will be resulting Net Social Benefit (NSB) of the agreement?...
4. Consider an industry with three firms. Firm 1’s marginal cost of abatement (MCA)=20-2E1, where E...
4. Consider an industry with three firms. Firm 1’s marginal cost of abatement (MCA)=20-2E1, where E is the tons of pollution emitted. Firm 2’s MCA=10-E2. Firm 3’s MCA=40-2E3. Please draw a diagram to support your answers to the following questions. If there is no policy to reduce pollution, how much pollution will be emitted by each firm? What will be total pollution? If the government imposes a tax of $10/ton, how much pollution will be emitted by each firm? What...
MACa = 400 – E, MACb = 300 – E, and MACc = 200 – E....
MACa = 400 – E, MACb = 300 – E, and MACc = 200 – E. MD = 2E/3, where MAC is Marginal Abatement Cost, MD is marginal damages, and E is emissions. The regulator is currently using uniform standards to regulate the firms to 270 units of emissions collectively. (All else equal) What is the Net Social Benefit of switching to individualized standards?
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT