Question

Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...

Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance).

  1. What is the market price of SO2 abatement?

  1. How many permits are traded between firms, who is selling to who, and what are the Total Emission Fees (TEF) for each firm?
  1. What is the sum of all emission fees under cap-and-trade, TEF1 + TEF2?

  1. Instead of cap-and-trade, the government decides to impose a pollution tax equivalent to the market price of SO2 you found on part d. Without any further calculations, indicate what is the abatement level for each firm under the pollution tax.

  1. What would be the total emission fees (TEF) under the pollution tax? Compare it with your answer for cap-and-trade. How would this comparison be if the initial cap-and-trade permits (allowances) were sold in an auction, and not given for free?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

A) MAC1=2x1 ,x1= MAC1/2

MAC2=3x2. ,x2=MAC2/3

Aggregate MAC: x=5MAC/6

MAC=1.2x

So total abatement=60+60=120

MAC=1.2*120=144

So market price of permit is 144$.

B)x1=144/2=72

X2=144/3=48

So firm 1 abate more than it required ,which tells that firm 1 is selling its permit.

Firm 2 abatement is less than required ,which means that firm 2 is buying the permit.

So trade of permit=12 units.

TEF1=-144*12=-1728( it benefit by selling permit)

TEF2=144*12=1728

C)TEF1+TEF2=-1728+1728=0

D)under this pollution tax =144$, the ABATEMENT levels are,

x1=72

X2=48

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). a) In a first moment assume polluters are not allowed to trade, so each firm...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
Assume there are two polluting firms in two different cities. In the business-as-usual outcome, Firm #1...
Assume there are two polluting firms in two different cities. In the business-as-usual outcome, Firm #1 would emit 20 units of pollution (e1=20) and Firm #2 would emit 20 units of pollution (e2=20). Additionally, assume the marginal abatement costs for Firm #1 and Firm #2 are given below: MAC1 (x1) = 0.5x1    &    MAC2 (x2) = 2x2 This pollutant is known to cause adverse health effects when in high concentrations. Since the firms are in different cities, assume the marginal social benefit...
1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region, each of which generated 10...
1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region, each of which generated 10 units of pollution for a total of 20 units released into the environment. The government determined that emissions must be reduced by 12 units across the region to achieve the ”socially desirable level of pollu- tion”. Each firm faces different abatement cost conditions modelled as follows: for Polluter 1, marginal abatement cost is MAC1 = 26- 2.6E1. For Polluter 2, marginal abatement cost is...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1 + 300, and the marginal cost of abatement for firm 2 is MC2 = 3e2, where e1 and e2 are the tons of pollution abatement by firms 1 and 2, respectively. Baseline pollution levels are bl1 = 2000 and bl2 = 2000. Suppose the government sets a pollution reduction goal of 1600 total units of abatement. Write down two equations that ensure that the...
In a different part of the world there a two different firms: Firm A and Firm...
In a different part of the world there a two different firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 100 tons of pollution. Firm A faces marginal abatement cost MACA = 5A and Firm B faces marginal abatement cost MACB = 2A where A is tons of pollution abatement. The government’s control authority wishes the firms to reduce total emissions to 130 tons using the Cap and Trade system and plans to initially give each firm half...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total...
Assume you have three firms with different marginal abatement cost functions as follows: MAC1 =2q1 MAC2...
Assume you have three firms with different marginal abatement cost functions as follows: MAC1 =2q1 MAC2 =q2 MAC3 = 12q3 It has been determined that the total amount of pollution should be reduced by 35 units. (a) Find the cost-effective allocation of pollution abatement for each firm.
Suppose there are only two sources of SO2 emissions in Ohio. Source 1 is a coal...
Suppose there are only two sources of SO2 emissions in Ohio. Source 1 is a coal fired power plant and Source 2 is an oil refinery. Marginal control costs for the two firms are given by MCC1=100*q1 and MCC2=300*q2, where q1 and q2 represent the tons of pollution that each respective firm controls. Each of these two sources both currently emits 20 tons of sulfur dioxide. Ohio's government decides that it wants to reduce SO2 pollution by 20 tons total....
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT