(1) The people of Alberta are tired of Canadians from other provinces taking their construction jobs and so the legislature of Alberta has enacted a law saying that from now on only people who have lived in Alberta for more than two years can get a job in the Alberta construction industry. Frank lives in Ontario but he has been seriously considering moving to Alberta. Is there any LEGAL argument Frank could make in a 2 of 2 court to allow him to move to Alberta and get a job in the construction industry? If so, what LEGAL arguments could the legislature of Alberta make to stop him from being successful in court? Who do you think would be successful if the issue ended up in court, and why?
THE PEOPLE OF ALBERTA ARE TIRED OF CANADIANS FROM OTHER PROVIENCES TAKING THEIR CONSTRUCTION JOBS AND SO THE LEGISLATURE OF ALBERTA HAS ENCATED A LAW SAYING THAT FROM NOW ON ONLY PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED IN ALBERTA FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS CAN GET A JOB IN ALBERTA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY .
YES THERE WOULD BE AN LEGAL ARGUMENT FRANK COULD MAKE IN A 2 OF 2 COURT TO ALLOW HIM TO MOVE TO ALBERTA AND TO GET A JOB IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY BECAUSE WHEN YOU LEAVE ONE PLACE FOR ANOTHER PLACE THERE IS A LEGAL ACTION AND PAPER WORK IN THE GOVT.
ALBERTA WILL SHOW THE NEGATIVE REPOST AGAINST HIM
HE WILL GIVE IS BEST TO PROVE HIM NEGATIVE HE WILL SHOW ALL THE ITEMS WHICH CAN BE HARMFUL FOR HIM HE WILL PERFORM ALL HIS GOOD EFORTS SO THAT HE COULD WIN
ALBERTA WILL WIN BECAUSE HE HAS THE POWER TO SHOW EVERYTHING IN THE COURT
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.