Question

When a court is using minimum scrutiny to evaluate a challenged legal classification, the government must show that the classification:

Question 7 options:

	produces more benefit than harm.
	is not contradictory or vague.
	serves an important state interest.
	is rationally related to a legitimate state interest.

Answer 1

Solution:-Option D is correct

D.is rationally related to a legitimate state interest.

Explaination:-When a court is using minimum scrutiny to evaluate a challenged legal classification, the government must show that the classification is rationally related to a legitimate state interest.This is the lowest level of scrutiny applied to challenged laws, and it has historically required very little for a law to pass as constitutional.Under the rational basis test, the person challenging the law (not the government) must prove either:The government has no legitimate interest in the law or policy; orThere is no reasonable, rational link between that interest and the challenged law.