Question

A company is considering 3 mutually exclusive alternatives along with "Do-Nothing" as part of a new...

A company is considering 3 mutually exclusive alternatives along with "Do-Nothing" as part of a new quality improvement initiative. The alternatives are in the table below. For each alternative, the salvage value at the end of the useful life is zero. At the end of 10 years, Alternative Z can be replaced by another Z with identical costs and benefits. If the MARR is 6.5 %, and the analysis period is 20 years, which alternative should be selected?

X Y Z
Installed Cost $15,000 $20,000 $10,000
Uniform Annual Benefit $1,625 $1,890 $1,625
Useful Life, in years 20 20 10
MARR 6.50% 6.50% 6.50%

Homework Answers

Answer #1

NPW of X = -15000 + 1625*(P/A,6.5%,20)

= -15000 + 1625*(((1 + 0.065)^20-1)/(0.065*(1 + 0.065)^20))

= -15000 + 1625*(((1.065)^20-1)/(0.065*(1.065)^20))

= -15000 + 1625*11.018507

= 2905.07

NPW of Y = -20000 + 1890*(P/A,6.5%,20)

= -20000 + 1890*(((1 + 0.065)^20-1)/(0.065*(1 + 0.065)^20))

= -20000 + 1890*(((1.065)^20-1)/(0.065*(1.065)^20))

= -20000 + 1890*11.018507

= 824.98

NPW of Z = -10000 + 1625*(P/A,6.5%,20) - 10000*(P/F,6.5%,10)

= -10000 + 1625*(((1 + 0.065)^20-1)/(0.065*(1 + 0.065)^20)) - 10000*((1 + 0.065)^-10)

= -10000 + 1625*(((1.065)^20-1)/(0.065*(1.065)^20)) - 10000*((1.065)^-10)

= -10000 + 1625*11.018507 - 10000*0.532726

= 2577.81

As NPW of X is highest, it should be selected

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program.The alternatives...
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program.The alternatives are: A   B C Installed cost $10,000 $15,000 $ 20,000 Annual benefit 1625 1530 1890   Useful life (Years) 10 20 20 The salvage value of each alternative is zero.At the end of 10 years Alternative A could be replaced with another A with identical cost and benefits . a)Which alternative should be selected if interest is 6% b)3% c)If there is a difference between...
Consider the three mutually exclusive alternatives below. At the end of their useful lives, Alternatives X...
Consider the three mutually exclusive alternatives below. At the end of their useful lives, Alternatives X and Z will be replaced with identical replacements so that a 10-year service requirement is met. If the MARR is 3% per year, which alternative (if any) should be chosen based on the annual worth method? Alt X Alt Y Alt Z Capital investment $300,000 $425,000. $500,000. Annual savings $68,750 $108,750. $188,750. Salvage value $90,000 $125,000. $140,000. Life, years 10 20 5
Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives. The MARR is 10%based on the payback period method, which alternative...
Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives. The MARR is 10%based on the payback period method, which alternative should be selected? Year             X           Y           Z 0                   -$100    -$50      -$50 1                   25          16          21 2                   25          16          21 3                   25          16          21 4                   25          16          21 Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives, each with a 20 year life span and no salvage value. The minimum attractive rate of return is 6%. A                         B                           C Initial Cost                                     $4000                 $8000                           $10,000 Uniform Annual Benefit ($)            410                    ...
When the mutually exclusive alternatives under consideration have only disbursements (service alternatives), the do-nothing alternative must...
When the mutually exclusive alternatives under consideration have only disbursements (service alternatives), the do-nothing alternative must be included so that a rate of return analysis can be conducted on the incremental cash flow. Question 1 options: True False
Consider the following mutually exclusive alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital investment Net annual receipts $702,000...
Consider the following mutually exclusive alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital investment Net annual receipts $702,000 $123,550 $1,656,000 $276,200 Both alternatives have a useful life of 12 years and no market value at that time. The MARR is 12 % per year. Determine the annual worth (AW) of the most profitable course of action. (Enter your answer as a number without the dollar sign.)
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives​ (one must be​ chosen). The...
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives​ (one must be​ chosen). The MARR is 4​% per year. Lead Acid Lithium Ion Capital investment ​$5,000 ​$13,000 Annual expenses ​$2,250 ​$2,500 Useful life 12 years 18 years Market value at end of useful life ​$0 ​$2,600 LOADING... Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when i=4​% per year. Determine which alternative should be selected if the repeatability assumption applies. The AW of...
A large textile company is trying to decide among three alternatives of sludge dewatering processes. The...
A large textile company is trying to decide among three alternatives of sludge dewatering processes. The costs associated with these alternatives are shown below. Alternative Y will need an upgrade of $9700 at the end of year 2. At the end of year 2, alternative Z would be replaced with another alternative Z having the same installed and operating costs. If the MARR is 14% per year, which alternative should be chosen? Alternative X Y Z Installed costs $68,500 $48,500...
Compare two mutually exclusive alternatives below using annual worth analysis at MARR = 10% per year....
Compare two mutually exclusive alternatives below using annual worth analysis at MARR = 10% per year. Which alternative should be selected? Alternatives Alternative 1 Alternative 2 First cost, $ -90,000 -750,000 Annual cost, $/year -50,000 -10,000 Salvage value, $ 8,000 - Life, years 5 ∞ Alternative 2 and -$85,000 Alternative 1 and -$72,450 Alternative 2 and -$72,450 Alternative 1 and -$65,000
Two mutually exclusive alternatives (MEAs) are available to reduce potential earthquake damage at a government site....
Two mutually exclusive alternatives (MEAs) are available to reduce potential earthquake damage at a government site. The cash flow estimates for each alternative are shown below. The one-time repair costs occur in the middle of the period, that is, in year 10. Each MEA has a 20-year life. At an interest rate of 8% per year, determine the Benefit-to-Cost ratio (B/C) of the “increment.” Alternative One Alternative Two First Cost ($) -500,000 -1,100,000 Annual cost ($/year) -30,000 -40,000 One-time repair...
No Excel. Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200...
No Excel. Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100...