Question

Do you agree with California public policy against non compete agreements? As a current of future...

Do you agree with California public policy against non compete agreements? As a current of future business owner, under what scenarios would you find it to be advantageous to have an enforceable non compete agreement?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

A non compete agreement is a contract where the employee promises to stay away from any kind of competition with the employer after the term period is over and also not to share any kind of proprietary information of the organization to anyone during the term period and after leaving the company. This helps to take legal action against those who violate the terms and conditions. California invalidates all non compete agreement except for equity stake holders. The major advantage of non compete clause is that it protects the rights of businesses. That is an employee can't leave his job and immediately can't start a new business to compete his employer. This helps the businessmen to protect their business secrets .

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1. Non-compete agreements are unenforceable if not in writing. True/false 2. In 1994, the Arizona Supreme...
1. Non-compete agreements are unenforceable if not in writing. True/false 2. In 1994, the Arizona Supreme Court decided the case of Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents and found a duty of care to avoid providing alcohol to underage consumers. If in 2010 a plaintiff from Flagstaff, a city in Arizona brings a lawsuit against a student group at an Arizona university of providing alcohol to members under the legal drinking age; will the Hernandez v. Arizona board of regent’s...
Unit 10 Discussion Topic 1 Discussion Topic The Noncompete Agreement and Course Reflection A non-compete agreement...
Unit 10 Discussion Topic 1 Discussion Topic The Noncompete Agreement and Course Reflection A non-compete agreement is an agreement some organizations ask their employees to sign restricting them from competing for a specific period of time and in a defined geographic area when they leave the organization. Companies use these agreements to provide protection of their operational information and customer relationships. The Unit 10 Discussion provides the opportunity to practice key elements involved with non-compete contracts including legal issues. Topic...
Find an example of a regulated monopoly. Do you agree that this monopoly should be regulated?...
Find an example of a regulated monopoly. Do you agree that this monopoly should be regulated? If yes, how does regulating it benefit the society? (You may also consider what would happen if it weren't regulated) If no, what are your arguments against regulating it?
Bentley has paid $40,000 in premiums on a whole life policy with a $250,000 death benefit....
Bentley has paid $40,000 in premiums on a whole life policy with a $250,000 death benefit. The policy has paid a dividend of $1,000 per year for the past 10 years. If Bentley surrenders the policy today for it’s cash value of $55,000, what will be the amount of gain subject to taxation? A. $55,000 B. $15,000 C. $25,000 D. $0 Which of the following statements regarding entity purchase buy-sell agreements is correct? A. When one of the owners dies,...
Hey i just read your comment and you just need to answer do you agree or...
Hey i just read your comment and you just need to answer do you agree or disagree with ir and explain My Teacher gave this answer and we need to response this answer You need to response this answer why you agree with it or why you disagree and explain You have Two Answer you need to response on your own word Reactions may include: feedback, agreements, disagreements, etc. with supporting facts, material, citations, etc. to support your reaction (or...
EVALUATING CURRENT HEALTH INSURANCE: Question: Assess your current health insurance situation. Do you have any health...
EVALUATING CURRENT HEALTH INSURANCE: Question: Assess your current health insurance situation. Do you have any health insurance now? What does your policy cover? What is excluded? Are there any gaps that you think need to be filled? Are there any risks in your current lifestyle or situation that might make additional coverage necessary? If you were to purchase health insurance for youself in the near future, what type of plan would you select, and why? What steps can you take...
You own a Barbecue Resturant, a) Choose two areas of public law that we're discussing in...
You own a Barbecue Resturant, a) Choose two areas of public law that we're discussing in this unit (Public Law Areas and The Practical Impacts of Public Law on Business) - administrative law and criminal law. You will opt to select administrative law as one area (since it deals directly with government regulation); be specific in answering the question of what your business will need to do (both at the outset and as a continuing practice) as a cost of...
Conduct a Vision Audit on your imaginary organization. Imagine that you are starting a non-profit organization....
Conduct a Vision Audit on your imaginary organization. Imagine that you are starting a non-profit organization. Answer the four questions Does the organization have a clearly stated vision? If so, what is it. If the organization continues on its current path, where will it be heading over the next decade? How good would such a direction be? Do key people in the organization know where the organization is headed and agree on the direction? Do the structures, processes, personnel, incentives,...
What do you think of eac of these ideas? Do you agree or disagree for each...
What do you think of eac of these ideas? Do you agree or disagree for each one give the answer in full sentences 1. I do find his approach of deductive reasoning as a replacement of inductive reasoning a valid way to define scientific practice because the process is the process no matter if one is proving something right or wrong. I feel it can be applied to all branches and should be because as states in the reading it...
Two players, A and B, have $1 to divide between them. They agree to spend at...
Two players, A and B, have $1 to divide between them. They agree to spend at most three days negotiating over the division. If they can’t come to an agreement they both get nothing, i.e. $0. The first day, A will make an offer, B either accepts or comes backs with a counteroffer the next day, and on the third day A gets to make one final offer if he rejected the offer of B on day 2. Both A...