Question

A large utility company is considering two mutually exclusive methods for storing its coal combustion by-products....

A large utility company is considering two mutually exclusive methods for storing its coal combustion by-products. One method is wet (slurry) storage and the second method is dry storage. The company must adopt one of those two methods for all 2B of its ash and gypsum impoundments at seven coal-fired power plants. Wet storage requires an initial investment of S2 billion, followed by annual maintenance expenses of S300 million over a 10-year period of time. Dry storage has a $2.5 billion capital investment and $150 million per year upkeep expenses over its 7-year life lf the company's MARR is 10% per year, which method should be recommended assuming repeatability?

(Engineering Economy 17th Edition)

Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 10% per year The equivalent uniform annual cost for the wet storage is million.(Round to one decimal place.)

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer:-

For Wet storage:

MARR=10%

n=10 year

Cost = 2000M

Annual maintenance expense = 300M

EUAC for Wet storage = 2000M(A/P,10%,10)+300M

=2000M(0.162745)+300M

=325.49M+300M

=625.49M

=625.5M

For Dry storage:

MARR=10%

n=7 YEARS

Cost = 2500M

Annual maintenance expense = 150M

EUAC for Dry storage = 2500M(A/P,10%,7)+150M

=2500M(0.205405)+150M

=513.5125+150

=663.5125M

=663.5M

As the EUAC for the Wet storage is less so it should be selected.

Please upvote,thankyou.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives​ (one must be​ chosen). The...
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives​ (one must be​ chosen). The MARR is 4​% per year. Lead Acid Lithium Ion Capital investment ​$5,000 ​$13,000 Annual expenses ​$2,250 ​$2,500 Useful life 12 years 18 years Market value at end of useful life ​$0 ​$2,600 LOADING... Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when i=4​% per year. Determine which alternative should be selected if the repeatability assumption applies. The AW of...
Two mutually exclusive diesel generators are considered for purchase by a power generation company. Information relevant...
Two mutually exclusive diesel generators are considered for purchase by a power generation company. Information relevant to compare the alternatives is summarized below: Generator A Generator B Capital investment $100,000 $80,000 Market value at the end of service life $35,000 $10,000 Annual fuel and maintenance expenses $3,000 $5,000 Service life 10 years 10 years Use the IRR method to determine the better machine to be purchased. The MARR is 10% per year.
Please show me how to apply CVP analysis for this case study. FLY ASH BRICK PROJECT:...
Please show me how to apply CVP analysis for this case study. FLY ASH BRICK PROJECT: FEASIBILITY STUDY USING CVP ANALYSIS S. K. Mitra and Shubhra Hajela wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized or otherwise reproduced in any...
13. NPV and IRR Analysis Cummings Products Company is considering two mutually exclusive investments whose expected...
13. NPV and IRR Analysis Cummings Products Company is considering two mutually exclusive investments whose expected net cash flows are as follows: Expected Net Cash Flows Year Project A Project B 0 -$400 -$650 1 -528 210 2 -219 210 3 -150 210 4 1,100 210 5 820 210 6 990 210 7 -325 210 Select the correct graph for NPV profiles for Projects A and B.     The correct graph is (select one) graph __? What is each project's...
Internal Rate of Return Method—Two Projects Cousin's Salted Snack Company is considering two possible investments: a...
Internal Rate of Return Method—Two Projects Cousin's Salted Snack Company is considering two possible investments: a delivery truck or a bagging machine. The delivery truck would cost $47,766.00 and could be used to deliver an additional 45,000 bags of pretzels per year. Each bag of pretzels can be sold for a contribution margin of $0.58. The delivery truck operating expenses, excluding depreciation, are $0.79 per mile for 15,000 miles per year. The bagging machine would replace an old bagging machine,...
Internal Rate of Return Method—Two Projects Munch N’ Crunch Snack Company is considering two possible investments:...
Internal Rate of Return Method—Two Projects Munch N’ Crunch Snack Company is considering two possible investments: a delivery truck or a bagging machine. The delivery truck would cost $31,525.14 and could be used to deliver an additional 51,000 bags of pretzels per year. Each bag of pretzels can be sold for a contribution margin of $0.38. The delivery truck operating expenses, excluding depreciation, are $0.52 per mile for 17,000 miles per year. The bagging machine would replace an old bagging...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From...
Sign In INNOVATION Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company by Michael Hammer From the April 2004 Issue Save Share 8.95 In 1991, Progressive Insurance, an automobile insurer based in Mayfield Village, Ohio, had approximately $1.3 billion in sales. By 2002, that figure had grown to $9.5 billion. What fashionable strategies did Progressive employ to achieve sevenfold growth in just over a decade? Was it positioned in a high-growth industry? Hardly. Auto insurance is a mature, 100-year-old industry...