Question

The marginal abatement (control) costs for two air pollutants sources that affect a single receptor are...

The marginal abatement (control) costs for two air pollutants sources that affect a single receptor are MAC1 = $0.6 q1 and MAC2 = $1.0q2, where q1 and q2 are emissions abated. Their respective transfer coefficients are a1 = 3.0 and a2 = 2.0. Without any control, they would each emit 20 units of emissions each. The ambient standard is 24 ppm.

I. If an ambient permit system were established, how many permits would be issued and what price would prevail?

II. How much would each source spend on permits if they were auctioned off?How much would each source ultimately spend on permits if each source were initially given free of charge, exactly half of the total permits?

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). What is the market price of SO2 abatement? How many permits are traded between firms,...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2 = 100?1, where q1 and q2 are, respectively the amount of emissions abated for firm 1 and firm 2. Assume that with no control at all each firm would be abating 20 units of emissions or a total of 40 units for both firms. a) Calculate the marginal cost for abating 20 units of emissions for each firm. b) Calculate the cost-effective allocation of...
Suppose two point sources are discharging phosphorus into Wisconsin’s Fox River and face the following abatement...
Suppose two point sources are discharging phosphorus into Wisconsin’s Fox River and face the following abatement costs for this pollutant: Point Source 1: TAC1 = 500 + 0.35(A1)2 MAC1 = 0.7A1 Point Source 2: TAC2 = 750 + 1.05(A2)2 MAC2 = 2.1A2, where A1 and A2 represent the abatement of phosphorus effluents in pounds by Source 1 and Source 2, respectively, and TAC and MAC are measured in hundreds of dollars. Assume that the state environmental authority has set the...
Please answer E only . Below are the marginal abatement costs from two different sources. They...
Please answer E only . Below are the marginal abatement costs from two different sources. They currently emit 100 tons each. A. What would the total abatement cost be for an equiporportional cutback to a total of 100 tons? B. Suppose we issue 10 transferable permits, each entitles the firm to 10 tons of emissions. They are distributed equally to both sources. What are the final emissions each of the two sources?             C. What are the total abatement costs...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1=...
Two polluting firms emit 200 tons of SO2 each, with Marginal Abatement Costs given by MAC1= 2X1 and MAC2= 3X2, respectively. Xi represents the level of abatement for each firm i, in tons. The government wants to reduce total SO2 emissions by 30% and decides to impose a uniform cap on emissions, with each firm receiving 140 allowances for free (firms don’t pay for allowance). a) In a first moment assume polluters are not allowed to trade, so each firm...
1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region, each of which generated 10...
1. Consider the problem of two polluting sources in the region, each of which generated 10 units of pollution for a total of 20 units released into the environment. The government determined that emissions must be reduced by 12 units across the region to achieve the ”socially desirable level of pollu- tion”. Each firm faces different abatement cost conditions modelled as follows: for Polluter 1, marginal abatement cost is MAC1 = 26- 2.6E1. For Polluter 2, marginal abatement cost is...
In this situation there are two independent firms, each emitting 15 units of pollutants into the...
In this situation there are two independent firms, each emitting 15 units of pollutants into the environment for a total of 30 units in their region. The government imposes an abatement standard of 15 units. The polluter’s cost functions are as follows: TAC1 = 5 + 0.75(A1)^2 and MAC1 = 2A1 and TAC2 = 5 + 0.5(A2)^2 and MAC2 = A2, where A is units of abatement undertaken by a firm a. Suppose that the government mandates each company to...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the...
(c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB = 35 − 0.5Q What is the efficient level of abatement? (d) What is the relationship between cost-effectiveness and efficiency? (e) What pollution tax would yield the efficient level of abatement you found in part (c)? If the pollution charge is levied on all units of emissions, how much revenue would the government receive? (f)...