Question

Is this statement true or false? Explain why the statement is true or false. Two firms,...

Is this statement true or false? Explain why the statement is true or false.

Two firms, 1 and 2, can control their emissions of a pollutant according to the following marginal cost equations: MC1 = $1*q1 and MC2 = $1/2*q2, where q1 and q2 are the amount of emissions controlled by firm 1 and firm 2, respectively. In addition, each firm is currently emitting 100 units of pollution and neither firm is controlling its emissions. Assuming the control authority has concluded that the total emissions generated by the two firms must be reduced by 60 units. The cost-effective allocation in reduction is to have firm 1 reduce emissions by 40units and firm 2 reduce emissions by 20 units.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The statement is true.

Explanation:

Two firms abatement ratio = MC1 : MC2

                 1q1 : (1/2)q2

              i.e 1 : 0.5

            Total = 1 + 0.5 = 1.5

Total Emission must be reduced by 60 units.

i.e 60 / 1.5 = 40 units

Firm 1 have to reduce emissions by = 40 units * 1 = 40 units

Firm 2 have to reduce emissions by = 40 units * 0.5 = 20 units

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions...
This problem set reviews the basic analytics of cost-effective pollution control. Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $12·q1; MC2 = $4·q2, where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 40 units of emissions (for aggregate emissions of 80 tons), and assume that there are no significant transaction costs. 1) Compute...
You can use graphs or simple algebra to answer this question; either way, be sure to...
You can use graphs or simple algebra to answer this question; either way, be sure to show all of your work and/or explain your reasoning. Two firms can reduce emissions of a pollutant at the following marginal costs: MC1 = $3 q1 MC2 = $1 q2 where q1 and q2 are, respectively, the amount of emissions reduced by the first and second firms. Total pollution-control cost functions for the two firms are Respectively: TC1 = $100 + $60 (q1)2                                                                                      TC2...
Is the statement true or false? Ans explain why the statement is true or false. Assume...
Is the statement true or false? Ans explain why the statement is true or false. Assume a firm’s marginal costs of pollution control can be expressed as MC = 10Q where Q is the units of pollution controlled. In addition, assume the firm is currently emitting 25 units of pollution per time period, Q = 0, and the government has decided to impose a tax of $20 on each unit of pollution emitted by the firm. The optimal level of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1= 3e1and MC2= 45e2, where e1and e2are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total pollution by 400 units. If...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of...
Suppose that two firms emit a certain pollutant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The marginal cost (MC) of reducing pollution for each firm is as follows: MC1 = 3e1 and MC2 = 45e2, where e1 and e2 are the amounts (in tons) of emissions reduced by the first and second firms, respectively. Assume that in the absence of government intervention, Firm 1 generates 500 units of emissions and Firm 2 generates 500 units of emissions. Suppose Shreveport regulators decide to reduce total...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two polluting firms can control emissions of a pollutant by incurring the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1 = $300?1, and MAC2 = $100?2 where ?1, and ?2 are the amount of emissions abated (i.e., pollution controlled) by firm 1 and firm 2 respectively. Assume that with no abatement of emissions at all, firm 1 would release 15 units of pollution and firm 2 would release 10 units, for a total of 25 units. Assume the target level of abatement is...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2...
Two firms can control emissions at the following marginal abatement costs. ?? 1= 200?1 and ??.2 = 100?1, where q1 and q2 are, respectively the amount of emissions abated for firm 1 and firm 2. Assume that with no control at all each firm would be abating 20 units of emissions or a total of 40 units for both firms. a) Calculate the marginal cost for abating 20 units of emissions for each firm. b) Calculate the cost-effective allocation of...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1 + 300, and the marginal cost of abatement for firm 2 is MC2 = 3e2, where e1 and e2 are the tons of pollution abatement by firms 1 and 2, respectively. Baseline pollution levels are bl1 = 2000 and bl2 = 2000. Suppose the government sets a pollution reduction goal of 1600 total units of abatement. Write down two equations that ensure that the...
In a different part of the world there a two different firms: Firm A and Firm...
In a different part of the world there a two different firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 100 tons of pollution. Firm A faces marginal abatement cost MACA = 5A and Firm B faces marginal abatement cost MACB = 2A where A is tons of pollution abatement. The government’s control authority wishes the firms to reduce total emissions to 130 tons using the Cap and Trade system and plans to initially give each firm half...
Choose “True” or “False” for each statement (10 pts) just answer as true or false a)...
Choose “True” or “False” for each statement (10 pts) just answer as true or false a) True or False: Government intervention is not always necessary to solve negative externalities problems. b) True or False: If there are negative externalities associated with good X, the price of X that a firm charge will be too high compared with socially optimal level of price. c) True or False: If emissions are controlled by tradable pollution permits, total abatement costs are minimized.