Question

Show that the consumer is better off with a lump-sum tax rather than a proportional tax...

  1. Show that the consumer is better off with a lump-sum tax rather than a proportional tax on wage income (as in question 3) given that either tax yields the same revenue for the government. You must use a diagram to show this. (Hint: The consumption bundle the consumer chooses under the proportional tax must be just affordable given the lump-sum tax.)

Homework Answers

Answer #1

From the diagram we can see that, initially without any tax the original choice of a consumer is at point A on IC1, the highest IC.

But after the proportional tax, budget line pivot and new bundle is at point B on IC2, on the lower IC than before. consumption bundle decrease.

But due to imposition of income tax, money income decrease, but consume shift on the higher IC at IC3.

He is better off in income tax than in proportional tax, bcoz in proportional tax, his original bundle deteriorates, but in income tax his consumption doesn't deteriorates and he can achieve maximum satisfaction on higher IC.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
2) The work-leisure decision and the one period model of the macroeconomy (6 marks) i) Show...
2) The work-leisure decision and the one period model of the macroeconomy i) Show that a consumer is better off with a lump sum tax than with a proportional tax as wage income given that either tax yields the same revenue for the government. Show this using a diagram and in words. ii) Provide an example of a lump sum tax in the real world. (1 mark)
The government has decided it wants to make Peter better off. It is deciding whether to...
The government has decided it wants to make Peter better off. It is deciding whether to give him a lump sum grant or to subsidize his hourly wages. Show in a diagram that: a. If both interventions make Peter equally well off, the lump sum grant will reduce Peter’s labor supply by more than the wage subsidy. b. Under the lump sum grant, Peter can be made just as well off as under the wage subsidy at a lower total...
1. The lump sum principle says...? All taxes make a consumer equally unhappy A tax on...
1. The lump sum principle says...? All taxes make a consumer equally unhappy A tax on one good make a consumer happier than an equivalent revenue lump sum tax. A tax on one good make a consumer less happy than an equivalent revenue lump sum tax. Tax revenues should only be used as a lump sum, not split up among many projects A tax on one good should be kept small. 2. For normal goods…? A change in income causes...
1. Consider the representative consumer’s problem as follows. The representative consumer maximizes utility by choosing the...
1. Consider the representative consumer’s problem as follows. The representative consumer maximizes utility by choosing the amount of consumption good C and the amount of leisure l . The consumer has h units of time available for leisure l and for working Ns , that is, h = l+Ns . Government imposes a proportional tax on the consumer’s wage income. The consumer’s after-tax wage income is then (1−t )w(h −l ), where 0 < t < 1 is the tax...
Suppose the representative consumer’s preferences are given by the utility function, U(C, l) = aln C...
Suppose the representative consumer’s preferences are given by the utility function, U(C, l) = aln C + (1- a) ln l Where C is consumption and l is leisure, with a utility function that is increasing both the arguments and strictly quiescence, and twice differentiable. Question: The total quantity of time available to the consumer is h. The consumer earns w real wage from working in the market, receives endowment π from his/her parents, and pays the T lump-sum tax...
Consider a one-period closed economy, i.e. agents (consumers, firms and government) live for one period, consumers...
Consider a one-period closed economy, i.e. agents (consumers, firms and government) live for one period, consumers supply labor and demand consumption good, whereas their utility function is in the form of log(C−χN1+ν/1+ν ) (GHH preference). Firms supply consumption good and demand labor and their production function is y = zN^1−α. The government finances an exogenous spending via lump-sum taxes. Suppose there is a positive shock on χ which means the consumers favor leisure (or dislike labor) by much more than...
Your government desires that the poor in your economy eat more French Vanilla Ice Cream (a...
Your government desires that the poor in your economy eat more French Vanilla Ice Cream (a healthy protein supplement).  So it taxes the rich and gives the tax revenues as a $20.00 per-month subsidy to each poor person with which she/he MUST spend on this ice cram flavor.    (a)With the price of "all other goods (AOG)" at $1.00 per unit and the price of French Vanilla Ice Cream at $1.00 for dollar each carton, show how a typical poor person with an income...
i just uploaded another screenshot as a correction for below question 【 4 】 Consider an...
i just uploaded another screenshot as a correction for below question 【 4 】 Consider an individual who lives for two periods. The individual has no initial wealth and earns (exogenous) labor incomes of amounts Y1 and Y2 in the two periods. The individual can borrow and lend at a fixed interest rate r. The individual’s lifetime utility function is given by U = ln C1 +   1   ln C2, where ρ is the rate of time preference. Also consider...
Problem 1 [32 marks] A consumer has a demand function for good 2, ?2, that depends...
Problem 1 [32 marks] A consumer has a demand function for good 2, ?2, that depends on the price of good 1, ?1, the price of good 2, ?2, and income, ?, given by ?2 = 2 + 240 ??2 + 2?1. Initially, assume ? = 40, ?2 = 1, and ?1 = 2. Then the price of good 2 increases to ?2 ′ = 3. a) What is the total change in demand for good 2? [2 marks] b)...
Federal income tax allows a deduction for any state tax paid during the year. In addition,...
Federal income tax allows a deduction for any state tax paid during the year. In addition, the state of Alabama allows a deduction from its state income tax for any federal tax paid during the year. The federal corporate income tax is equivalent to a flat rate of 34% and the Alabama state tax rate is a flat 5%. Both the Alabama and the federal taxable income for a corporation is $1,000,000 before either tax is paid. Because each tax...