Question

Prove: ~p v q |- p -> q by natural deduction

Prove: ~p v q |- p -> q by natural deduction

Engineering   Computer-Science   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

We can solve this using proof by assumption and natural deduction. We will assume that the premise is true and apply natural deduction to conclude that our assumption was true.

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Prove: (p ∧ ¬r → q) and p → (q ∨ r) are biconditional using natural...
Prove: (p ∧ ¬r → q) and p → (q ∨ r) are biconditional using natural deduction NOT TRUTH TABLE
Prove equivalent: P⊃ (Q ⊃ P) and (~Q ⊃ (P ⊃ (~Q V P)))
Prove equivalent: P⊃ (Q ⊃ P) and (~Q ⊃ (P ⊃ (~Q V P)))
Using rules of inference prove. (P -> R) -> ( (Q -> R) -> ((P v...
Using rules of inference prove. (P -> R) -> ( (Q -> R) -> ((P v Q) -> R) ) Justify each step using rules of inference.
p → q, r → s ⊢ p ∨ r → q ∨ s Solve using...
p → q, r → s ⊢ p ∨ r → q ∨ s Solve using natural deduction rules.
Establish the equivalence of the following formulas: a) ┐(p v q), ┐p ^ ┐q b) p...
Establish the equivalence of the following formulas: a) ┐(p v q), ┐p ^ ┐q b) p v (q ^ r), (p v q) ^ (p v r) c) p -> (q -> r), (p ^ q) -> r d) p <-> q, (p -> q) ^ (q -> p)
Prove a)p→q, r→s⊢p∨r→q∨s b)(p ∨ (q → p)) ∧ q ⊢ p
Prove a)p→q, r→s⊢p∨r→q∨s b)(p ∨ (q → p)) ∧ q ⊢ p
Prove p ∨ (q ∧ r) ⇒ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) by constructing...
Prove p ∨ (q ∧ r) ⇒ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) by constructing a proof tree whose premise is p∨(q∧r) and whose conclusion is (p∨q)∧(p∨r).
Prove or disprove that [(p → q) ∧ (p → r)] and [p→ (q ∧ r)]...
Prove or disprove that [(p → q) ∧ (p → r)] and [p→ (q ∧ r)] are logically equivalent.
1. Prove p∧q=q∧p 2. Prove[((∀x)P(x))∧((∀x)Q(x))]→[(∀x)(P(x)∧Q(x))]. Remember to be strict in your treatment of quantifiers .3. Prove...
1. Prove p∧q=q∧p 2. Prove[((∀x)P(x))∧((∀x)Q(x))]→[(∀x)(P(x)∧Q(x))]. Remember to be strict in your treatment of quantifiers .3. Prove R∪(S∩T) = (R∪S)∩(R∪T). 4.Consider the relation R={(x,y)∈R×R||x−y|≤1} on Z. Show that this relation is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.
[16pt] Which of the following formulas are semantically equivalent to p → (q ∨ r): For...
[16pt] Which of the following formulas are semantically equivalent to p → (q ∨ r): For each formula from the following (denoted by X) that is equivalent to p → (q ∨ r), prove the validity of X « p → (q ∨ r) using natural deduction. For each formula that is not equivalent to p → (q ∨ r), draw its truth table and clearly mark the entries that result in the inequivalence. Assume the binding priority used in...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT