Question

Describe the system approach and its significance for project managers.

Describe the system approach and its significance for project managers.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The Systems Approach
The “systems” approach describes a way of dealing with complex problems and opportunities in organizations; this approach has received much publicity in recent years, in the professional journals and in the popular press. The literature ranges from esoteric prescriptions of the nature of the systems approach in the professional journals to “cookbook” recipes in the popular press.

The systems approach is often described as a disciplined way of viewing the world, and the solution of problems and the exploitation of opportunities in that world. Some writers describe the systems approach as a process of blowing the problem up to its largest dimensions” and then redefining problems, analyzing, synthesizing, improving through feedback, and finally verifying the alternative courses of action in the decision process. Others view the world and its problems and opportunities in the systems context as “everything” being related to “everything else.” The definition of a system in dictionary terms as an “organization or complex whole; an assemblage or combination of things or parts forming a complex or unitary whole” provides a good point of departure to relate the meaning of a “system” to project management.

If project management is viewed in its systems context, we might speak of a project management system which inherently contains a set of sub-systems that make up the larger system. The effectiveness of that larger system depends on the effectiveness of the supporting subsystems individually, as well as how these subsystems are synergized into the larger system as it functions as an entity. It is the way in which a project management system operates as an entity in its environment that ultimately determines the success or failure of project management in the organization.

Developing a concept of project management in systems terms requires that the project management system be viewed in as large a context as possible. This context of the “systems viewpoint” must be considered when project management is introduced into an organization. Too often a manager will realign his organization into a “matrix” form of structure without giving any real thought to what happens in the environment by way of a total “systems” change. After a period of time has gone by the “matrix” form of organizational structure is not working. For example:

— Members of the organization may not fully understand the diverse patterns of authority and responsibility that have emerged. There is interpersonal conflict; people resist the change in personal and organizational relationships that project management brings about.

— The information flows, reporting work accomplished on the project within the organization, have become more complex and interwoven, crossing different organizational functions and levels as the information is sought on a project basis.

— Managers become overly protective of their organizational functions and levels as the information is sought on a project basis.

— Managers become overly protective of their organizational “territory” and their belief in the unilateral right to commit resources in that territory.

— Control of the work in the organization becomes difficult and confused. Uncertainties arise concerning the question: “Who’s really responsible for the work on a project when the work is divided up into several different functional elements of the organization?”

— People are bothered by the apparent violation of unity of command by having to work for two bosses. The question, “Who works for whom?” is often raised.

— There is an unstable “cultural ambience” in the organization. People really do not know what is acceptable behavior — particularly with respect to their reporting relations in the matrix organization.

After a period of time has gone by people begin to realize that project management is not working as was hoped. Things are still pretty much done in the traditional manner, but with more controversy, frustration, and friction. The matrix organization is not understood! People in general are not comfortable with the idea of project management; they yearn for the “good old days” when everyone knew what was going on!

The general state of discomfort that the members of the organization feel has probably come about for a couple of reasons. First, project management was not recognized in its total systems context; it was introduced into the organization without any assessment of what the total “systems effect” would be. Second, inadequate attention was given to preparing the people for the cultural changes that result when project management is introduced in an organization. In subsequent sections of this article the “systems approach” of project management will be suggested through the definition of project management in systems terms.

Defining A Project Management System
If one takes the notion of a “system” as the basis for describing project management, one could describe the “subsystems” as follows:

The Facilitative Organizational Subsystem or the organizational arrangement that is used to superimpose the project teams on the functional structure. The resulting “matrix” organization portrays the formal authority and responsibility patterns and the personal reporting relationships aimed at providing an organizational focal point for starting and completing specific projects. Two complementary organizational units tend to emerge in such an organizational context: The project team and the functional units.

The Project Planning Subsystem which deals with the selection of projects, identification of project objectives and goals, and the formulation of the strategy by which these objectives and goals will be accomplished. Project plans prescribe both the ends and the means for successful project accomplishment. The project plan deals with how resources will be allocated to support the project drawing upon organizational resources wherever located.

The Project Control Subsystem provides for the selection of performance standards for the project schedule, budget, and technical performance. This subsystem deals with information feedback to compare actual progress with planned progress and the initiation of corrective action as required. The rationale for a control subsystem arises out of the need for monitoring the various organizational units that are performing work on the project in order to deliver results on time and within budget.

The Project Management Information Subsystem contains the intelligence essential to the effective control of the projects. This subsystem may be informal in nature — consisting of periodic meetings with the project participants who report information on the status of their project work — or a formal information retrieval system that provides frequent “printouts” of what is going on. This subsystem provides the intelligence to enable the project team members to make and implement decisions in the management of the project.

Techniques and Methodology is not really a subsystem in the sense that the term subsystem is used here. Techniques and methodology such as: PERT, CPM, PERT-Cost related scheduling techniques, modeling, simulation, linear programming, regression analysis, and such management science techniques which help to evaluate the risk and uncertainty factors in making project decisions.

The Cultural * Ambience Subsystem in which project management is practiced in the organization. Much of the nature of the cultural ambience can be described in how the people — the social groups — feel about the way in which project management is being carried out in the organization. The emotional patterns of the social groups, their perceptions, attitudes, prejudices, assumptions, experiences, values, all go to develop the organization’s cultural ambience. This ambience influences how people act and react, how they think, feel, and what they say in the organization, all of which ultimately determines what is taken for socially acceptable behavior in the organization.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Describe how a POS system could be useful to a company's marketing managers. How could it...
Describe how a POS system could be useful to a company's marketing managers. How could it be useful to purchasing agents?
One of the problems project managers encounter in the final phases of a project is "fighting...
One of the problems project managers encounter in the final phases of a project is "fighting a let’s get this over syndrome” in the project team. Please describe what I mean by this syndrome. How would you go about overcoming this?
It is important for project managers to manage risk over the complete project lifecycle. However, many...
It is important for project managers to manage risk over the complete project lifecycle. However, many project managers report that it is difficult to sustain team members’ and other stakeholders’ interest in managing risk once the project is underway. Why do project stakeholders lose interest in project risk once the project is underway? Describe at least 2 reasons.                                              (1 mark) What are the risks/dangers of not doing risk analysis as the project progresses?
Successful project managers are committed to the training and development of the people on their team....
Successful project managers are committed to the training and development of the people on their team. True False Successful project managers focus on the technical problems of the project and let dealing with people up to the HR department. True False Involving the project team in developing the project plan increases cost and time and should be avoided by the project manager. True False ______________ involves securing the appropriate resources to perform the work and creating an environment in which...
Project managers are often faced with having to manage trade-offs between competing project objectives. For this...
Project managers are often faced with having to manage trade-offs between competing project objectives. For this discussion, address the following: Describe the triple constraint. What are the three components and what is the relationship between them? Provide a scenario for a project manager not having control over one or more of the constraints. Support the post with appropriate citations and references.
Compare and describe, the systems approach, principles approach and processing approach of memory.
Compare and describe, the systems approach, principles approach and processing approach of memory.
Which of the folkowing would describe the plannjng function of managers? a. Comminucating the goals of...
Which of the folkowing would describe the plannjng function of managers? a. Comminucating the goals of managers to the employees b. Assessing whether the company is achieving its goals c Evaluatig how well plans wrre implemented d. Measuring the performance of managers
Compare and contrast the “critical values approach” and the “p-value approach” for determining the statistical significance...
Compare and contrast the “critical values approach” and the “p-value approach” for determining the statistical significance of an hypothesis test.
. Why is a business’s approach to environmental concerns so challenging for managers? and What is...
. Why is a business’s approach to environmental concerns so challenging for managers? and What is the relationship between sustainable development and climate change?
Explain why managers can use the payback approach to advance their own interests at the expense...
Explain why managers can use the payback approach to advance their own interests at the expense of the stockholders.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT