Question

Prove using rules of inference: ?(?indy) ∀x(S(x) <-> Q(x)) ∀x(Q(x) ʌ R(x)) R(Cindy)

Prove using rules of inference:

?(?indy)

∀x(S(x) <-> Q(x))

∀x(Q(x) ʌ R(x))

R(Cindy)

Engineering   Computer-Science   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The answer for the above mentioned question is explained below ::

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Using rules of inference prove. (P -> R) -> ( (Q -> R) -> ((P v...
Using rules of inference prove. (P -> R) -> ( (Q -> R) -> ((P v Q) -> R) ) Justify each step using rules of inference.
p → q, r → s ⊢ p ∨ r → q ∨ s Solve using...
p → q, r → s ⊢ p ∨ r → q ∨ s Solve using natural deduction rules.
1. Prove p∧q=q∧p 2. Prove[((∀x)P(x))∧((∀x)Q(x))]→[(∀x)(P(x)∧Q(x))]. Remember to be strict in your treatment of quantifiers .3. Prove...
1. Prove p∧q=q∧p 2. Prove[((∀x)P(x))∧((∀x)Q(x))]→[(∀x)(P(x)∧Q(x))]. Remember to be strict in your treatment of quantifiers .3. Prove R∪(S∩T) = (R∪S)∩(R∪T). 4.Consider the relation R={(x,y)∈R×R||x−y|≤1} on Z. Show that this relation is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.
Prove a)p→q, r→s⊢p∨r→q∨s b)(p ∨ (q → p)) ∧ q ⊢ p
Prove a)p→q, r→s⊢p∨r→q∨s b)(p ∨ (q → p)) ∧ q ⊢ p
Prove that for every x ∈ R \ Q, the set Ax = {qx | q...
Prove that for every x ∈ R \ Q, the set Ax = {qx | q ∈ Q} is dense in R. please prove with dense property.
Please explained using the inference rules and also show all steps. In each part below, give...
Please explained using the inference rules and also show all steps. In each part below, give a formal proof that the sentence given is valid or else provided an interpretation in which the sentence is false. (a) ∀xP' (x) → ∃x[P(x) → Q'(x)]. (b) ∃x[P(x) → Q'(x)] → ∃xP' (x).
Please explained using the inference rules and also show all steps. In each part below, give...
Please explained using the inference rules and also show all steps. In each part below, give a formal proof that the sentence given is valid or else provided an interpretation in which the sentence is false. (a) ∀xP' (x) → ∃x[P(x) → Q'(x)]. (b) ∃x[P(x) → Q'(x)] → ∃xP' (x).
Prove: (p ∧ ¬r → q) and p → (q ∨ r) are biconditional using natural...
Prove: (p ∧ ¬r → q) and p → (q ∨ r) are biconditional using natural deduction NOT TRUTH TABLE
Prove: If D = Q\{3}. R = Q\{-3}, and f:D-> R is defined by f(x) =...
Prove: If D = Q\{3}. R = Q\{-3}, and f:D-> R is defined by f(x) = 1+3x/3-x for all x in D, then f is one-to-one and onto.
4 Inference proofs Use laws of equivalence and inference rules to show how you can derive...
4 Inference proofs Use laws of equivalence and inference rules to show how you can derive the conclusions from the given premises. Be sure to cite the rule used at each line and the line numbers of the hypotheses used for each rule. a) Givens: 1 a∧b 2 c → ¬a 3 c∨d Conclusion: d b) Givens 1 p→(q∧r) 2 ¬r Conclusion ¬p
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT