Question

Why are inside attackers potentially more dangerous than external attackers?

  1. Why are inside attackers potentially more dangerous than external attackers?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

inside attackers and external attackers create serious cyber threats.

when considering both insiders are more dangerous.

because they have direct access to the companies data and systems.so the effect of their attack cannot be predicted.it can destroy entire company.because they are aware of each and every weakness and strength of the companies system.this may leads to lose all the data.even the strengths of the system cannot prevent the atatck.if someone is aware of all the weakness it destroy the strength of the system.

insider threats are difficult to detect.

it will be mostly detected when the attack takes a shape.

i hope the answer is clear and satisfactory

if you have any doubts feel free to ask in comment section.i will surely help

please give me a thumbs up

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Why are inside attackers potentially more dangerous than external attackers? List and describe the function of...
Why are inside attackers potentially more dangerous than external attackers? List and describe the function of each field of an x.509 (v3) digital certificate (RFC3280). Hint: There are eight Basic Certificate Fields and a number of extensible options. Field Function(s) – _______________ – _______________ – _______________ – _______________ – _______________ – _______________ – _______________ – _______________
Why are alpha rays much more dangerous when the source of radiation is located inside the...
Why are alpha rays much more dangerous when the source of radiation is located inside the body? a. Alpha rays are less dangerous when outside the body because they are deactivated by light and air. However, once inside the body they can do great harm to any cells they come in contact with. b. Alpha rays are less dangerous when outside the body because they are too far from blood cells. Inside the body they can do great harm if...
Based on the water analogy what do you think is more potentially dangerous to touch: a)...
Based on the water analogy what do you think is more potentially dangerous to touch: a) a system with a large current flowing b) a system with a large voltage?
explain why trauma to the brain stem is often much more dangerous than trauma than the...
explain why trauma to the brain stem is often much more dangerous than trauma than the frontal lobes
Explain why trauma to the brain stem is often much more dangerous than trauma to the...
Explain why trauma to the brain stem is often much more dangerous than trauma to the frontal lobes
A drug, which is used for treating cancer, has potentially dangerous side effects if it is...
A drug, which is used for treating cancer, has potentially dangerous side effects if it is taken in doses which are larger than the required dosage for the treatment. The tablet should contain 57.89mg and the standard deviation should be 0.04. 10 tablets are randomly selected and the amount of drug in each tablet is measured. The sample has a mean of 57.885mg and a variance of 0.0002mg. Does the data suggest at α=0.05 that the tablets vary by less...
Why are the circumstances of chronic infection or chronic activation of the immune system so potentially...
Why are the circumstances of chronic infection or chronic activation of the immune system so potentially dangerous? Please frame your answers with respect to the innate immune system and include at least two reasons.
TRUE? FALSE? 1. A CDS is potentially dangerous because it can incentivize risky investments, like emerging...
TRUE? FALSE? 1. A CDS is potentially dangerous because it can incentivize risky investments, like emerging markets bonds or subprime loaded MBS, and transfer risk outside of the financial institutions to insurance industry as a form of insurance.
why is it less dangerous to be exposed to high-intensity red light than low-intensity gamma rays?
why is it less dangerous to be exposed to high-intensity red light than low-intensity gamma rays?
can you think of any reason why it might be more advantageous for the external epithelium...
can you think of any reason why it might be more advantageous for the external epithelium (i.e. the skin) to be comprised of squamous cells rather than cuboidal or columnar?