Given an SRM coal sample containing 41.7 ppm Fe, replicate experimental measurements yieldconcentrations of 44.0, 41.6, 45.3 and 48.7 ppm Fe giving a mean of 44.9 ppm and a standarddeviation of 2.961 ppm. What is the 95% confidence interval on the data?
a) 44.9±4.711 b) 44.9±4.1099 c)44.9±3.4836 d) 44.9±5.2254 e) other
Does the method in question #5 reproduce the known value using 90% confidence intervals?
a) Yes b) no
Another method was applied to the coal sample in #5 and the 4 measurements resulted in thesame mean (44.9 ppm) with a standard deviation of 3.356. Is this standard deviationsignificantly different from the first one at the 95% confidence level? what test can be used to determine?
a) yes, F-test b) yes, t-test c) no, F-test d) no, linear regression e) yes, ANO
Solution.
The confidence interval can be found by the formula:
x̅ ± Za/2 * σ/√(n)
x̅ = 44.9;
a = 0.95;
σ = 2.961;
n = 4
Z0.475 = 1.96; (obtained from reference tables)
Using 90% confidence level, the confidence interval is (Z0.450 =1.645)
44.9-2.435 = 42.645 => the method in question #5 does not reproduce the known value using 90% confidence intervals.
Is this standard deviationsignificantly different from the first one at the 95% confidence level? It can be cheched performing F-test.
Square both standard deviations to get the variances: s1 = 2.9612 = 8.768; s2 = 3.3562 = 11.263; s2/s1 = 1.285;
Degrees of freedom: 4-1 = 3. The F-value from the reference table is 9.277. The F-table value is greater than the calculated value, we must accept the null hypothesis - two population variances are equal.
The answer is c) no, F-test.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.