Locus EST |
Locus ICD |
Locus LA |
Locus PAP |
Locus ME |
|||||||||||
SS |
SF |
FF |
SS |
SF |
FF |
SS |
SF |
FF |
SS |
SF |
FF |
SS |
SF |
FF |
|
California |
36 |
20 |
7 |
48 |
4 |
4 |
20 |
11 |
2 |
16 |
7 |
10 |
16 |
11 |
5 |
Alaska |
3 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
For which loci and populations are the genotypes not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium? Confirm your conclusions by performing a chi-square test for each of the five loci in both the California and Alaska populations. You must show your work! (you will require more space then provided below) (note: n is different for each locus investigated)
California:
Locus EST: total no of samples= 36+20+7=63. x2= 36/63=0.571 . so x= 0.755. similarly y2= 7/63=0.11, so y= 0.33.
since x+y is not equal to 1, they are not in equilibrium.
Locus ICD: total no of samples = 56. x=0.92 & y=0.26. Hence , not in equilibrium.
Locus LA: total no of samples=33. x=0.77 & y=0.39. Not in equilibrium.
Locus PAP:total no of samples =33. x=0.69 & y=0.55. Not in equilibrium.
Locus ME: total no of samples= 32. x=0.70 & y= 0.39. Not in equilibrium.
Alaska:
Locus EST: total no of samples:8. x=0.61 & y=0.5. not in equilibrium
Locus ICD: total no of samples:11. x=0.79 & y=0.42 not in equilibrium
Locus LA: total no of samples:7. x=0.53 & y = 0.65 not in equilibrium
Locus PAP: total no of samples=7. x=0.65 & y=0.36. since x+y =1 . in equilibrium.
Locus ME: total no of samples= 4. x=0.5 & y= 0.5. in equilibrium
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.