Explain the differences between the evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin's natural selection and Lynn Margulis is endosymbiosis. Are the theories testable and expensive, according to Steven Gould's standards? Does the apparent contradiction between the theories weaken or strengthen the theory of evolution? Why or why not? Feel free to address Michael Pollen's discussion about plants some and Lovelock's Gaia theory around are your ideas.
According to Darwin, an organism go through the natural selection, that includes inherited variation that help the organism to compete, reproduce and survive whereas Lynn Margulis does not agree with Darwin. She said that eukaryotes have arise from prokaryotic organism using endosymbiosis not by natural selection .
According to Steven Gould, natural selection is incorrect theory and he proposed that theory of punctuated equilibrium for the origin of species.
The contricdiction weaken the evolutionary theory. as all the theories are contracting each other.
Michael pollen believed in the "plant intelligence ". He believed that plant feel emotion, can dance on the music and can respond accordingly to your behavior.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.