Question

In the prisoner’s dilemma game, the tit-for-tat strategy is a Nash equilibrium when the game is...

In the prisoner’s dilemma game, the tit-for-tat strategy is a Nash equilibrium when the game is played a single time.

true/false?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

True

In the prisoner’s dilemma game, the tit-for-tat strategy is a Nash equilibrium when the game is played in single time.

Tit for tat is a game-theory strategy subject to a payoff matrix like that of a prisoner's dilemma. Tit for tat was introduced by Anatol Rapoport, who developed a strategy in which each participant in an iterated prisoner's dilemma follows a course of action consistent with his opponent's previous turn.

Nash equilibrium is a concept within game theory where the optimal outcome of a game is where there is no incentive to deviate from their initial strategy. More specifically, the Nash equilibrium is a concept of game theory where the optimal outcome of a game is one where no player has an incentive to deviate from his chosen strategy after considering an opponent's choice. Nash equilibrium does not give an optimal solution for repeated games.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Question 29. The Tit-for-Tat strategy will evolve in the Prisoner’s Dilemma when it is played 1,000,589...
Question 29. The Tit-for-Tat strategy will evolve in the Prisoner’s Dilemma when it is played 1,000,589 times and the players know that it will be played this many times. True or False
We know that the one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game results in a dominant Nash equilibrium strategy that...
We know that the one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game results in a dominant Nash equilibrium strategy that is Pareto inefficient. Suppose we allow the two prisoners to retaliate after their respective prison terms. Formally, what aspect of the game would this affect? Could a Pareto efficient outcome result?
Consider the following prisoner’s dilemma                                    &n
Consider the following prisoner’s dilemma                                                                                    Player 1                                                                             Share              Fight                                                        Share             15,15              5,18                                Player 2          Fight              18,5              7,7               a. Identify each players Nash strategies.               b. Does this game have a Nash equilibrium? If yes what is it?               c. Does this game have dominant strategy equilibrium? If yes what is it?               d What makes it a Prisoner’s dilemma?               e. What is the incentive to cheat?               f....
Fill in a payoff matrix for a prisoner’s dilemma game where one player has a dominant...
Fill in a payoff matrix for a prisoner’s dilemma game where one player has a dominant strategy and the other doesn’t. Firm 2 in Duopoly Firm 1 in Duopoly a. Explain the dominant and non-dominant strategy of the firms. b. Is there a Nash equilibrium in your game? Explain.
9.   (3pts) Name an optimal strategy (or an Evolutionary Stable Strategy) for the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game:...
9.   (3pts) Name an optimal strategy (or an Evolutionary Stable Strategy) for the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game: Describe one of the conditions that this strategy requires: Describe one of the rules of this strategy:
A prisoners' dilemma game will always have A. two Nash equilibria B. a unique Nash equilibrium...
A prisoners' dilemma game will always have A. two Nash equilibria B. a unique Nash equilibrium in dominant strategies C. a Nash equilibrium that is efficient D. a cooperative equilibrium
a. i. If a game has a dominant strategy equilibrium, does it have a Nash equilibrium?...
a. i. If a game has a dominant strategy equilibrium, does it have a Nash equilibrium? ii. If a game has a Nash equilibrium, does it have a dominant strategy equilibrium? iii. If one firm has a dominant strategy, can another firm take advantage of that fact in deciding on its optimal strategy? iv. Can a game have more than one dominant strategy equilibrium? v. Can a game have more than one Nash equilibrium? b) There are only two firms...
Game Theory: John and Dave are playing a game where they only have two strategies, either...
Game Theory: John and Dave are playing a game where they only have two strategies, either to move left or move right. The payoffs from this game are the points that each player will earn given the strategies that each play. The higher the points, the higher the payoffs each player will receive. The normal form representation of the game is presented below.                                                    DAVE                         Left                                                  Right Left 1,1 0,3 Right 3,0 2,2 John's name label should be on...
If a Prisoner’s dilemma game is repeated exactly 100 times, what does game theory predict will...
If a Prisoner’s dilemma game is repeated exactly 100 times, what does game theory predict will happen?
Which of the following is true for a Nash equilibrium of a two-player game? a) The...
Which of the following is true for a Nash equilibrium of a two-player game? a) The joint payoffs of the two players are highest compared to other strategy pairs. b) It is a combination of strategies that are best responses to each other.*? c) Every two-player game has a unique Nash equilibrium. d) None of the above is correct.