1- Which study design(s) require collecting information about participants over time? (Select all that apply.)
Cross-sectional |
||
Case-control |
||
Meta-analysis |
||
Cohort |
||
Experimental |
||
Ecological |
2- For the following research question, identify the exposure, outcome and population.
Does the number of parks in a neighborhood decrease crime rates within neighborhoods across the inland empire?
|
|
3- Match the following limitations with the most relevant type of research approach.
|
|
4- Based on the abstract of this research article, what is the most likely research approach?
Eating down or simply eating less? The diet and health implications of these practices during pregnancy and postpartum in rural Bangladesh
Objective: To: (i) determine the prevalence of self-reported eating less and eating down during early and late pregnancy and postpartum, and explore risk factors associated with eating less; (ii) examine the association between eating less and diet quality; and (iii) determine the association between eating less and weight gain during pregnancy.
Design: Data were collected longitudinally from a cohort of women participating in a community health programme. Diet was assessed at three time points (≤20 weeks’ gestation, 36 weeks’ gestation, 6 months’ postpartum), body weight was measured during study enrolment (≤20 weeks’ gestation) and at 36 weeks’ gestation, and information about the woman and her household was collected at enrolment.
Setting: The Rang-Din Nutrition Study in the Rangpur and Dinajpur districts of Bangladesh.
Subjects: Women (n 4011).
Results: The prevalence of self-reported eating less differed by time point (75·9 % in early pregnancy, 38·8 % in late pregnancy, 7·4 % postpartum; P<0·001). The most common reason for eating less across all time periods was food aversion or loss of appetite. Women who reported eating less in late pregnancy had consumed animal-source foods less frequently in the preceding week than women who reported eating more (mean (sd): 11·7 (7·4) v. 14·8 (9·2) times/week; P<0·001) and had lower weekly weight gain than women who reported eating more (mean (se): 0·27 (0·004) v. 0·33 (0·004) kg/week; P<0·001).
Conclusions: Eating less has negative implications with respect to diet quality and pregnancy weight gain in this context
Citation: Harding, K. L., Matias, S. L., Mridha, M. K., Vosti, S. A., Hussain, S., Dewey, K. G., & Stewart, C. P. (2017). Eating down or simply eating less? The diet and health implications of these practices during pregnancy and postpartum in rural Bangladesh. Public health nutrition, 20(11), 1928-1940.
Cannot tell from the abstract |
||
Primary analysis |
||
Secondary analysis |
||
Tertiary analysis |
In cross sectional study only day is collected in a specific point of time and not for long period
Yes case control study collect information for a long period of time
Meta analysis does not collect information it is a combination of some studies.
Yes cohort study asses data over long periods of time
In experimental study only data is collected about the point of experiment
Yes ecological study asses data of individual for a long period of time
So the answer are
Case control study, cohort study and ecological study
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.