Question

Prove that the relation R on the set of all people, defined by xRy if x...

Prove that the relation R on the set of all people, defined by xRy if x and y have the same first name is an equivalence relation.

Math   Advanced-Math   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1. We define a relation C on the set of humans as xRy ⇐⇒ x and...
1. We define a relation C on the set of humans as xRy ⇐⇒ x and y were born in the same country Describe the equivalence class containing yourself as an element. 2. Let R be an equivalence relation with (x, y) ∈ R and (y, z) is not ∈ R (that is, y does not relate to z). Can you determine whether or not xRz? Why or why not?
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x,...
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x, y) ∈ R if and only if x + 2 > y. For example, (4, 3) is in R because 4 + 2 = 6, which is greater than 3. (a) Is the relation reflexive? Prove or disprove. (b) Is the relation symmetric? Prove or disprove. (c) Is the relation transitive? Prove or disprove. (d) Is it an equivalence relation? Explain.
Let A={1,2,3,4,5,6} and let R be the relation on A defined by xRy iff x +...
Let A={1,2,3,4,5,6} and let R be the relation on A defined by xRy iff x + y is even and x is less than or equal to y. Determine if R is partial order.
Let R be the relation on the set of real numbers such that xRy if and...
Let R be the relation on the set of real numbers such that xRy if and only if x and y are real numbers that differ by less than 1, that is, |x − y| < 1. Which of the following pair or pairs can be used as a counterexample to show this relation is not an equivalence relation? A) (1, 1) B) (1, 1.8), (1.8, 3) C) (1, 1), (3, 3) D) (1, 1), (1, 1.5)
Consider the following relation on the set Z: xRy ? x2 + y is even. For...
Consider the following relation on the set Z: xRy ? x2 + y is even. For each question below, if your answer is "yes", then prove it, if your answer is "no", then show a counterexample. (i) Is R reflexive? (ii) Is R symmetric? (iii) Is R antisymmetric? (iv) Is R transitive? (v) Is R an equivalence relation? If it is, then describe the equivalence classes of R. How many equivalence classes are there?
5. Prove or disprove the following statements: (a) Let R be a relation on the set...
5. Prove or disprove the following statements: (a) Let R be a relation on the set Z of integers such that xRy if and only if xy ≥ 1. Then, R is irreflexive. (b) Let R be a relation on the set Z of integers such that xRy if and only if x = y + 1 or x = y − 1. Then, R is irreflexive. (c) Let R and S be reflexive relations on a set A. Then,...
a) Let R be an equivalence relation defined on some set A. Prove using induction that...
a) Let R be an equivalence relation defined on some set A. Prove using induction that R^n is also an equivalence relation. Note: In order to prove transitivity, you may use the fact that R is transitive if and only if R^n⊆R for ever positive integer ​n b) Prove or disprove that a partial order cannot have a cycle.
Let ​R​ be an equivalence relation defined on some set ​A​. Prove using mathematical induction that...
Let ​R​ be an equivalence relation defined on some set ​A​. Prove using mathematical induction that ​R​^n​ is also an equivalence relation.
I have a discrete math question. let R be a relation on the set of all...
I have a discrete math question. let R be a relation on the set of all real numbers given by cry if and only if x-y = 2piK for some integer K. prove that R is an equivalence relation.
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the...
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the information about the equivalence classes, as specified. a) The relation ∼ on R defined by x ∼ y iff x = y or xy = 2. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [2], [3], [−4/5 ], and [0] b) The relation ∼ on R+ × R+ defined by (x, y) ∼ (u, v) iff x2v = u2y. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [(5, 2)] and...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT