Context
A high school student named David Merrell did an experiment to examine if music affects the ability of rats to run a maze. The explanatory variable was exposure to music. He had three treatment groups: one group listened to heavy metal music by the group Anthrax. A second group listened to Mozart. The third group never heard music. This last group is the control group.
The response variable was the average time (in seconds) to complete three runs. Every week the rats ran the maze three times. Merrell recorded each rat's average time for the week.
Direct controls of potential confounding variables:
Results:
By the end of the month the Anthrax group was much slower at running the maze. The Mozart group was much faster. The dotplots below show average run times for the first and last week of the experiment. Each dot represents one rat. The X-value is the rat’s average run time for the week. (Each rat ran the maze 3 times each week.) The blue line is the mean run time for each treatment group.
Prompt
Merrell claims that he randomly assigned rats to treatment groups. Does the data shown in the dotplots above support his claim? Why or why not?
• The data support his claim. However, it would be better if the experiment is conducted many times and has the same outcome.
The distribution of run times for the first week and the last week are very different which shows that the assignment of rats was not random because in the first week the range of run times for Anthrax group was very heigh and it suddenly changed a lot in the last week which does not make sense and on the other hand the run times of Mozart group and Control drastically changed.it seems like Merrell assigned lazy rats to the Anthrax group in the last week.
Thank you so much sir
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.