Question

(Contributing to a public good) Each of n people chooses whether or not to contribute a...

(Contributing to a public good) Each of n people chooses whether or not to contribute a fixed amount toward the provision of a public good. The good is provided if and only if at least k people contribute, where 2 ≤ k ≤ n; if it is not provided, contributions are not refunded. Each person ranks outcomes from best to worst as follows: (i) any outcome in which the good is provided and she does not contribute, (ii) any outcome in which the good is provided and she contributes, (iii) any outcome in which the good is not provided and she does not contribute, (iv) any outcome in which the good is not provided and she contributes. Formulate this situation as a strategic game and find its Nash equilibria. (Is there a Nash equilibrium in which more than k people contribute? One in which k people contribute? One in which fewer than k people contribute? (Be careful!))

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
3. Voluntary contributions toward a public good Deborah and Janet are considering contributing toward the creation...
3. Voluntary contributions toward a public good Deborah and Janet are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the water fountain or to keep that $400 for a weekend getaway. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Deborah and Janet will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.60 of benefit. For...
Alice and Bob are each considering contributing to a public park which will be enjoyed by...
Alice and Bob are each considering contributing to a public park which will be enjoyed by all. Alice has $9, of which she’ll contribute $a. Bob has $12 of which he’ll contribute $b. Alice’s payoff depends on the total contribution, a + b, the money she has left over to spend on other things, 9 – a, and an “interaction term” combining both of these terms, (9 – a)(a + b). Thus her payoff, x = a + b +...
Homework 11 3. Voluntary contributions toward a public good Musashi and Sean are considering contributing toward...
Homework 11 3. Voluntary contributions toward a public good Musashi and Sean are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the water fountain or to keep that $400 for a pool table. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Musashi and Sean will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.80 of...
Stephanie is looking at each job in her organization and comparing its value relative to every...
Stephanie is looking at each job in her organization and comparing its value relative to every other job in the organization. When she completes this exercise, she will have done a ________ pay structure wage compression job evaluation rate range 2 points    QUESTION 16 To remain competitive, we will most likely have to________ match the benefits provided by our main competitors. approximately doubly partly half 2 points    QUESTION 17 If the company moves to a state that has...
2. SECURING THE WORKFORCE Diversity management in X-tech, a Japanese organisation This case is intended to...
2. SECURING THE WORKFORCE Diversity management in X-tech, a Japanese organisation This case is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than as an illustration of the effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. The name of the company is disguised. INTRODUCTION In light of demographic concerns, in 2012, the Japanese government initiated an effort to change the work environment in order to secure the workforce of the future. Japan is world renowned for its...
3 SECURING THE WORKFORCE Diversity management in X-tech, a Japanese organisation This case is intended to...
3 SECURING THE WORKFORCE Diversity management in X-tech, a Japanese organisation This case is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than as an illustration of the effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. The name of the company is disguised. INTRODUCTION In light of demographic concerns, in 2012, the Japanese government initiated an effort to change the work environment in order to secure the workforce of the future. Japan is world renowned for its...
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation....
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation. case:    W17400 APIGEE: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE CHALLENGE OF GROWTH Ranjeet Nambudiri, S. Ramnarayan, and Catherine Xavier wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich,...
Mattel Responds to Ethical Challenges Business Ethics This case was written by Debbie Thorne, John Fraedrich, O. C. Ferrell, and Jennifer Jackson, with the editorial assistance of Jennifer Sawayda. This case was developed for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative, ethical, or legal discussion by management. All sources used for this case were obtained through publicly available material. Mattel, Inc. is a world leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing of family...