Question

Consider the following relation ∼ on the set of integers a ∼ b ⇐⇒ b 2...

Consider the following relation ∼ on the set of integers

a ∼ b ⇐⇒ b 2 − a 2 is divisible by 3

Prove that this is an equivalence relation. List all equivalence classes.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

plz feel free to comment in case of doubts as i am happy to help you. Plz upvote the solution if u r satisfied. It means a lot to me. Thanks

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Let N* be the set of positive integers. The relation ∼ on N* is defined as...
Let N* be the set of positive integers. The relation ∼ on N* is defined as follows: m ∼ n ⇐⇒ ∃k ∈ N* mn = k2 (a) Prove that ∼ is an equivalence relation. (b) Find the equivalence classes of 2, 4, and 6.
Consider the following relation on the set Z: xRy ? x2 + y is even. For...
Consider the following relation on the set Z: xRy ? x2 + y is even. For each question below, if your answer is "yes", then prove it, if your answer is "no", then show a counterexample. (i) Is R reflexive? (ii) Is R symmetric? (iii) Is R antisymmetric? (iv) Is R transitive? (v) Is R an equivalence relation? If it is, then describe the equivalence classes of R. How many equivalence classes are there?
1. a. Consider the definition of relation. If A is the set of even numbers and...
1. a. Consider the definition of relation. If A is the set of even numbers and ≡ is the subset of ordered pairs (a,b) where a<b in the usual sense, is ≡ a relation? Explain. b. Consider the definition of partition on the bottom of page 18. Theorem 2 says that the equivalence classes of an equivalence relation form a partition of the set. Consider the set ℕ with the equivalence relation ≡ defined by the rule: a≡b in ℕ...
Consider the following set S = {(a,b)|a,b ∈ Z,b 6= 0} where Z denotes the integers....
Consider the following set S = {(a,b)|a,b ∈ Z,b 6= 0} where Z denotes the integers. Show that the relation (a,b)R(c,d) ↔ ad = bc on S is an equivalence relation. Give the equivalence class [(1,2)]. What can an equivalence class be associated with?
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the...
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the information about the equivalence classes, as specified. a) The relation ∼ on R defined by x ∼ y iff x = y or xy = 2. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [2], [3], [−4/5 ], and [0] b) The relation ∼ on R+ × R+ defined by (x, y) ∼ (u, v) iff x2v = u2y. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [(5, 2)] and...
Recall from class that we defined the set of integers by defining the equivalence relation ∼...
Recall from class that we defined the set of integers by defining the equivalence relation ∼ on N × N by (a, b) ∼ (c, d) =⇒ a + d = c + b, and then took the integers to be equivalence classes for this relation, i.e. Z = [(a, b)]∼ | (a, b) ∈ N × N . We then proceeded to define 0Z = [(0, 0)]∼, 1Z = [(1, 0)]∼, − [(a, b)]∼ = [(b, a)]∼, [(a, b)]∼...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. I need to prove that: a) R is an equivalence relation. (which I have) b) The equivalence classes of R correspond to the elements of  ℤpq. That is: [a] = [b] as equivalence classes of R if and only if [a] = [b] as elements of ℤpq I...
Let A be a non-empty set. Prove that if ∼ defines an equivalence relation on the...
Let A be a non-empty set. Prove that if ∼ defines an equivalence relation on the set A, then the set of equivalence classes of ∼ form a partition of A.
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x,...
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x, y) ∈ R if and only if x + 2 > y. For example, (4, 3) is in R because 4 + 2 = 6, which is greater than 3. (a) Is the relation reflexive? Prove or disprove. (b) Is the relation symmetric? Prove or disprove. (c) Is the relation transitive? Prove or disprove. (d) Is it an equivalence relation? Explain.
Let A = {−5, −4, −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3} and define a relation...
Let A = {−5, −4, −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3} and define a relation R on A as follows: For all (m, n) is in A, m R n ⇔ 5|(m2 − n2). It is a fact that R is an equivalence relation on A. Use set-roster notation to list the distinct equivalence classes of R. (Enter your answer as a comma-separated list of sets.) ____________
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT