Question

Consider the following relation ∼ on the set of integers a ∼ b ⇐⇒ b 2...

Consider the following relation ∼ on the set of integers

a ∼ b ⇐⇒ b 2 − a 2 is divisible by 3

Prove that this is an equivalence relation. List all equivalence classes.

Math   Advanced-Math   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

plz feel free to comment in case of doubts as i am happy to help you. Plz upvote the solution if u r satisfied. It means a lot to me. Thanks

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Let N* be the set of positive integers. The relation ∼ on N* is defined as...
Let N* be the set of positive integers. The relation ∼ on N* is defined as follows: m ∼ n ⇐⇒ ∃k ∈ N* mn = k2 (a) Prove that ∼ is an equivalence relation. (b) Find the equivalence classes of 2, 4, and 6.
Let R be the relation on the integers given by (a, b) ∈ R ⇐⇒ a...
Let R be the relation on the integers given by (a, b) ∈ R ⇐⇒ a − b is even. 1. Show that R is an equivalence relation 2. List teh equivalence classes for the relation Can anyone help?
Consider the following relation on the set Z: xRy ? x2 + y is even. For...
Consider the following relation on the set Z: xRy ? x2 + y is even. For each question below, if your answer is "yes", then prove it, if your answer is "no", then show a counterexample. (i) Is R reflexive? (ii) Is R symmetric? (iii) Is R antisymmetric? (iv) Is R transitive? (v) Is R an equivalence relation? If it is, then describe the equivalence classes of R. How many equivalence classes are there?
1. a. Consider the definition of relation. If A is the set of even numbers and...
1. a. Consider the definition of relation. If A is the set of even numbers and ≡ is the subset of ordered pairs (a,b) where a<b in the usual sense, is ≡ a relation? Explain. b. Consider the definition of partition on the bottom of page 18. Theorem 2 says that the equivalence classes of an equivalence relation form a partition of the set. Consider the set ℕ with the equivalence relation ≡ defined by the rule: a≡b in ℕ...
Consider the following set S = {(a,b)|a,b ∈ Z,b 6= 0} where Z denotes the integers....
Consider the following set S = {(a,b)|a,b ∈ Z,b 6= 0} where Z denotes the integers. Show that the relation (a,b)R(c,d) ↔ ad = bc on S is an equivalence relation. Give the equivalence class [(1,2)]. What can an equivalence class be associated with?
Consider the relation on the real numbers R. a ~ b if (a−b) ∈ Z. (Z...
Consider the relation on the real numbers R. a ~ b if (a−b) ∈ Z. (Z is the whole integers.) 1) Give two real numbers that are in the same equivalence class. 2) Give two real numbers that are not in the same equivalence class. 3) Prove that this relation is an equivalence relation.
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the...
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the information about the equivalence classes, as specified. a) The relation ∼ on R defined by x ∼ y iff x = y or xy = 2. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [2], [3], [−4/5 ], and [0] b) The relation ∼ on R+ × R+ defined by (x, y) ∼ (u, v) iff x2v = u2y. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [(5, 2)] and...
Recall from class that we defined the set of integers by defining the equivalence relation ∼...
Recall from class that we defined the set of integers by defining the equivalence relation ∼ on N × N by (a, b) ∼ (c, d) =⇒ a + d = c + b, and then took the integers to be equivalence classes for this relation, i.e. Z = [(a, b)]∼ | (a, b) ∈ N × N . We then proceeded to define 0Z = [(0, 0)]∼, 1Z = [(1, 0)]∼, − [(a, b)]∼ = [(b, a)]∼, [(a, b)]∼...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. I need to prove that: a) R is an equivalence relation. (which I have) b) The equivalence classes of R correspond to the elements of  ℤpq. That is: [a] = [b] as equivalence classes of R if and only if [a] = [b] as elements of ℤpq I...
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x,...
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x, y) ∈ R if and only if x + 2 > y. For example, (4, 3) is in R because 4 + 2 = 6, which is greater than 3. (a) Is the relation reflexive? Prove or disprove. (b) Is the relation symmetric? Prove or disprove. (c) Is the relation transitive? Prove or disprove. (d) Is it an equivalence relation? Explain.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT