Question

Suppose we define the relation R on the set of all people by the rule "a...

Suppose we define the relation R on the set of all people by the rule "a R b if and only if a is Facebook friends with b." Is this relation reflexive?  Is is symmetric?   Is it transitive?   Is it an equivalence relation? Briefly but clearly justify your answers.

Math   Advanced-Math   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Construct a binary relation R on a nonempty set A satisfying the given condition, justify your...
Construct a binary relation R on a nonempty set A satisfying the given condition, justify your solution. (a) R is an equivalence relation. (b) R is transitive, but not symmetric. (c) R is neither symmetric nor reflexive nor transitive. (d) (5 points) R is antisymmetric and symmetric.
the relation R on the set of all people where aRb means that a is younger...
the relation R on the set of all people where aRb means that a is younger than b. Determine if R is: reflexive symmetric transitive antisymmetric
Let A be the set of all integers, and let R be the relation "m divides...
Let A be the set of all integers, and let R be the relation "m divides n." Determine whether or not the given relation R, on the set A, is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, or transitive.
Let A be the set of all real numbers, and let R be the relation "less...
Let A be the set of all real numbers, and let R be the relation "less than." Determine whether or not the given relation R, on the set A, is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, or transitive.
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x,...
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x, y) ∈ R if and only if x + 2 > y. For example, (4, 3) is in R because 4 + 2 = 6, which is greater than 3. (a) Is the relation reflexive? Prove or disprove. (b) Is the relation symmetric? Prove or disprove. (c) Is the relation transitive? Prove or disprove. (d) Is it an equivalence relation? Explain.
Suppose that ~ is a relation defined on the vertices of a graph G. There are...
Suppose that ~ is a relation defined on the vertices of a graph G. There are three things we have to check to show that u ~ v is an equivalence relation: that it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. Describe clearly what each one requires.
2. Let R be a relation on the set of integers ℤ defined by ? =...
2. Let R be a relation on the set of integers ℤ defined by ? = {(?, ?): a2 + ?2 ?? ? ??????? ??????} Is this relation reflexive? Symmetric? transitive?
Consider the following relation on the set Z: xRy ? x2 + y is even. For...
Consider the following relation on the set Z: xRy ? x2 + y is even. For each question below, if your answer is "yes", then prove it, if your answer is "no", then show a counterexample. (i) Is R reflexive? (ii) Is R symmetric? (iii) Is R antisymmetric? (iv) Is R transitive? (v) Is R an equivalence relation? If it is, then describe the equivalence classes of R. How many equivalence classes are there?
Let F = {A ⊆ Z : |A| < ∞} be the set of all finite...
Let F = {A ⊆ Z : |A| < ∞} be the set of all finite sets of integers. Let R be the relation on F defined by A R B if and only if |A| = |B|. (a) Prove or disprove: R is reflexive. (b) Prove or disprove: R is irreflexive. (c) Prove or disprove: R is symmetric. (d) Prove or disprove: R is antisymmetric. (e) Prove or disprove: R is transitive. (f) Is R an equivalence relation? Is...
Determine the distance equivalence classes for the relation R is defined on ℤ by a R...
Determine the distance equivalence classes for the relation R is defined on ℤ by a R b if |a - 2| = |b - 2|. I had to prove it was an equivalence relation as well, but that part was not hard. Just want to know if the logic and presentation is sound for the last part: 8.48) A relation R is defined on ℤ by a R b if |a - 2| = |b - 2|. Prove that R...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT