Question

Let ​R​ be an equivalence relation defined on some set ​A​. Prove using mathematical induction that...

Let ​R​ be an equivalence relation defined on some set ​A​. Prove using mathematical induction that ​R​^n​ is also an equivalence relation.

Math   Advanced-Math   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
a) Let R be an equivalence relation defined on some set A. Prove using induction that...
a) Let R be an equivalence relation defined on some set A. Prove using induction that R^n is also an equivalence relation. Note: In order to prove transitivity, you may use the fact that R is transitive if and only if R^n⊆R for ever positive integer ​n b) Prove or disprove that a partial order cannot have a cycle.
Determine the distance equivalence classes for the relation R is defined on ℤ by a R...
Determine the distance equivalence classes for the relation R is defined on ℤ by a R b if |a - 2| = |b - 2|. I had to prove it was an equivalence relation as well, but that part was not hard. Just want to know if the logic and presentation is sound for the last part: 8.48) A relation R is defined on ℤ by a R b if |a - 2| = |b - 2|. Prove that R...
Let N* be the set of positive integers. The relation ∼ on N* is defined as...
Let N* be the set of positive integers. The relation ∼ on N* is defined as follows: m ∼ n ⇐⇒ ∃k ∈ N* mn = k2 (a) Prove that ∼ is an equivalence relation. (b) Find the equivalence classes of 2, 4, and 6.
Prove that the relation R on the set of all people, defined by xRy if x...
Prove that the relation R on the set of all people, defined by xRy if x and y have the same first name is an equivalence relation.
Let A be a non-empty set. Prove that if ∼ defines an equivalence relation on the...
Let A be a non-empty set. Prove that if ∼ defines an equivalence relation on the set A, then the set of equivalence classes of ∼ form a partition of A.
Let H be a group acting on A. Prove that the relation ∼ on A defined...
Let H be a group acting on A. Prove that the relation ∼ on A defined by a ∼ b if and only if a = hb for some h ∈ H is an equivalence relation.
Prove that the relation of set equivalence is an equivalence relation.
Prove that the relation of set equivalence is an equivalence relation.
13. Let R be a relation on Z × Z be defined as (a, b) R...
13. Let R be a relation on Z × Z be defined as (a, b) R (c, d) if and only if a + d = b + c. a. Prove that R is an equivalence relation on Z × Z. b. Determine [(2, 3)].
Let R be the relation on Z defined by: For any a, b ∈ Z ,...
Let R be the relation on Z defined by: For any a, b ∈ Z , aRb if and only if 4 | (a + 3b). (a) Prove that R is an equivalence relation. (b) Prove that for all integers a and b, aRb if and only if a ≡ b (mod 4)
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the...
For each of the following, prove that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then give the information about the equivalence classes, as specified. a) The relation ∼ on R defined by x ∼ y iff x = y or xy = 2. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [2], [3], [−4/5 ], and [0] b) The relation ∼ on R+ × R+ defined by (x, y) ∼ (u, v) iff x2v = u2y. Explicitly find the equivalence classes [(5, 2)] and...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT