Question

need step by step for MINITAB please Problem 1. Consider the GASTURBINE data set and corresponding...

need step by step for MINITAB please

Problem 1. Consider the GASTURBINE data set and corresponding output from Minitab. Use the complete data set in your analysis. The first 10 observations are given for illustrative purposes. Complete parts a) through g) below.

ENGINE

SHAFTS

RPM

CPRATIO

INLET-TEMP

EXH-TEMP

AIRFLOW

POWER

HEATRATE

Traditional

1

27245

9.2

1134

602

7

1630

14622

Traditional

1

14000

12.2

950

446

15

2726

13196

Traditional

1

17384

14.8

1149

537

20

5247

11948

Traditional

1

11085

11.8

1024

478

27

6726

11289

Traditional

1

14045

13.2

1149

553

29

7726

11964

Traditional

1

6211

15.7

1172

517

176

52600

10526

Traditional

1

6210

17.4

1177

510

193

57500

10387

Traditional

1

3600

13.5

1146

503

315

89600

10592

Traditional

1

3000

15.1

1146

524

375

113700

10460

Traditional

1

3000

15

1171

525

514

164300

10086

Regression Analysis: HEATRATE versus RPM, CPRATIO, …

The regression equation is

HEATRATE = 14314 + 0.0806 RPM - 6.8 CPRATIO - 9.51 INLET-TEMP + 14.2 EXH-TEMP

           - 2.55 AIRFLOW + 0.00426 POWER

Predictor       Coef   SE Coef      T      P

Constant       14314      1112 12.87 0.000

RPM          0.08058   0.01611   5.00 0.000

CPRATIO        -6.78     30.38 -0.22 0.824

INLET-TEMP    -9.507     1.529 -6.22 0.000

EXH-TEMP      14.155     3.469   4.08 0.000

AIRFLOW       -2.553     1.746 -1.46 0.149

POWER       0.004257 0.004217   1.01 0.317

S = 458.757   R-Sq = 92.5%   R-Sq(adj) = 91.7%

Analysis of Variance

Source          DF         SS        MS       F      P

Regression       6 155269735 25878289 122.96 0.000

Residual Error 60   12627473    210458

Total           66 167897208

  1. Write a first-order model in general form for the model that includes RPM, CPRATIO, INLET-TEMP, EXH-TEMP, AIRFLOW, and POWER to predict HEATRATE.
  2. Use Minitab to compose regression equation for HEATRATE based on RPM, CPRATIO, INLET-TEMP, EXH-TEMP, AIRFLOW, and POWER. Paste the output here:

  1. Write out the least squares prediction equation for the model that was fit above.

  1. Calculate and give an interpretation of the coefficients based on a one-unit change in each xi. Calculate and give an interpretation of the effect on HEATRATE based on a 1-unit change in AIRFLOW together with a 210-unit change in POWER.

  1. Interpret the overall model F-test. State the appropriate hypothesis test and associated numerator and denominator degrees of freedom used for this test as well as the critical value that the test statistic is compared to. State the conclusion you would make regarding the null hypothesis. Specifically, would you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, and what does this conclusion means about the model parameters? Does this tell us anything about the significance of the individual predictors? Why or why not?

                            

  1. Report and interpret the model R2.

  1. Which predictors are significant in the model? Report the appropriate hypothesis test and formal conclusion you would make regarding RPM and CPRATIO. In your conclusion, state their p-values and test statistics. Would you suggest removing all non-significant predictors at once and refitting the model? Why or why not?

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
From the following MINITAB regression analysis, what can you conclude for the hypothesis test of Ho:...
From the following MINITAB regression analysis, what can you conclude for the hypothesis test of Ho: β1=0 versus Ha: β1≠ 0 using α=0.10? The regression equation is Test2 = 27.8 + 0.583 Test1    Predictor Coef SE Coef T P Constant 27.82 25.00 1.11 0.278 Test1 0.5825 0.3070 1.90 0.071    S = 22.9977 R-Sq = 14.1% R-Sq(adj) = 10.2% The null hypothesis would not be rejected and the conclusion would be that the x variable is of no use...
Study the following Minitab output from a regression analysis to predict y from x. a. What...
Study the following Minitab output from a regression analysis to predict y from x. a. What is the equation of the regression model? b. What is the meaning of the coefficient of x? c. What is the result of the test of the slope of the regression model? Let α = .10.Why is the t ratio negative? d. Comment on r2 and the standard error of the estimate. e. Comment on the relationship of the F value to the t...
12.4 Study the following Minitab output from a regression analysis to predict y from x. a....
12.4 Study the following Minitab output from a regression analysis to predict y from x. a. What is the equation of the regression model? b. What is the meaning of the coefficient of x? c. What is the result of the test of the slope of the regression model? Let α = .10.Why is the t ratio negative? d. Comment on r2 and the standard error of the estimate. e. Comment on the relationship of the F value to the...
It has been speculated that there is a linear relationship between Oxygen and Hydrocarbon Levels. Specifically,...
It has been speculated that there is a linear relationship between Oxygen and Hydrocarbon Levels. Specifically, Oxygen purity is assumed to be dependent on Hydrocarbon levels. A linear regression is performed on the data in Minitab, and you get the following results: Regression Analysis: Purity-y versus Hydrocarbon level-X Predictor              Coef SE Coef      T      P Constant             74.283    1.593 46.62 0.000 Hydrocarbon level-X 14.947    1.317 11.35 0.000 S = 1.08653   R-Sq = 87.7%   R-Sq(adj) = 87.1% Analysis of Variance Source          DF      SS     ...
In a 1973 Technometrics article, the authors examined mortality rates (deaths per 100,000 population) for 60...
In a 1973 Technometrics article, the authors examined mortality rates (deaths per 100,000 population) for 60 metropolitan areas. The following is MINITAB output for a fit of the least-squares line to predict mortality from ambient SO2 measured as a "pollution potential." The regression equation is TOTAL MORT RATE = 918 + 0.418 SO2 POTENTIAL Predictor                        Coef               SE Coef               T              P Constant                        917.887            9.644               95.18        0.000 SO2 POTENTIAL        0.4179               0.1166              3.58         0.001 S = 56.7657              R-Sq =                             R-Sq(adj) = Analysis...
Results for: KCereals.mtw Regression Analysis: Rating versus Shelf position Method Categorical predictor coding (1, 0) Analysis...
Results for: KCereals.mtw Regression Analysis: Rating versus Shelf position Method Categorical predictor coding (1, 0) Analysis of Variance Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Regression 2 1511 755.6 5.50 0.013 Shelf position 2 1511 755.6 5.50 0.013 Error 20 2748 137.4 Total 22 4259 Model Summary S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 11.7222 35.48% 29.03% 21.34% Coefficients Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF Constant 32.85 4.43 7.41 0.000 Shelf position bottom 7.40 7.35 1.01 0.326 1.30 top 18.15 5.58...
Problem 4. Once again you will be using the EXPRESS data set. The first 10 observations...
Problem 4. Once again you will be using the EXPRESS data set. The first 10 observations are given for illustrative purposes. Weight Distance Cost 5.9 47 2.6 3.2 145 3.9 4.4 202 8 6.6 160 9.2 0.75 280 4.4 0.7 80 1.5 6.5 240 14.5 4.5 53 1.9 0.6 100 1 7.5 190 14 a) Write out a complete general first-order model including an interaction term for Cost as the outcome. b) Using Minitab, fit a model including the interaction...
3. (Exercise 4.32, using R) (2 pt) Cooling method for gas turbines. Recall the Journal of...
3. (Exercise 4.32, using R) (2 pt) Cooling method for gas turbines. Recall the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power (January 2005) study of a high-pressure inlet fogging method for a gas turbine engine, where we fitted a first-order model for heat rate (y) as a function of speed of the engine (x1), inlet temperature (x2), exhaust temperature (x3), cycle pressure ratio (x4), and air mass flow rate (x5). Now, in this example, a researcher hypothesized that the...
3. (Exercises 8.11, 8.20, using R) (3 pt) Cooling method for gas turbines. Refer to the...
3. (Exercises 8.11, 8.20, using R) (3 pt) Cooling method for gas turbines. Refer to the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power (January 2005) study of a high-pressure inlet fogging method for a gas turbine engine. We now consider the interaction model for heat rate (y) of a gas turbine as a function of cycle speed (x1) and cycle pressure ratio (x2), E(y) = β0 + β1x1 + β2x2 + β3x1x2. Import the data from the file “GASTURBINE.txt”...
Consider the following data on x = rainfall volume (m3) and y = runoff volume (m3)...
Consider the following data on x = rainfall volume (m3) and y = runoff volume (m3) for a particular location. x 5 12 14 16 23 30 40 47 55 67 72 83 96 112 127 y 4 10 13 14 15 25 27 45 38 46 53 67 82 99 105 Use the accompanying Minitab output to decide whether there is a useful linear relationship between rainfall and runoff. The regression equation is runoff = -1.82 + 0.839 rainfall...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT